2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the daytime OH radical and implication for its relationship with fine particles over megacity of Shanghai, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results agree well with the OH and HO 2 radical concentrations in Shanghai (1.02 × 10 7 molecules•cm −3 ) [24]. Shanghai was reported by previous studies to have respective values of (3-26) × 10 6 molecules•cm −3 and (2-25) × 10 8 molecules•cm −3 for OBM simulations and field observations [15,[24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Model Performance Evaluation: Oh and Ho 2 Simulationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results agree well with the OH and HO 2 radical concentrations in Shanghai (1.02 × 10 7 molecules•cm −3 ) [24]. Shanghai was reported by previous studies to have respective values of (3-26) × 10 6 molecules•cm −3 and (2-25) × 10 8 molecules•cm −3 for OBM simulations and field observations [15,[24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Model Performance Evaluation: Oh and Ho 2 Simulationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Lu et al () detected that daily concentration maximum of OH radical was in the range of (4–17) × 10 6 molecules cm −3 in Beijing. Nan et al () observed that the daytime OH radical concentration in Shanghai under steady state was averaged at 1.0 × 10 7 molecules cm −3 . The average OH level in the PRD during daytime in summer was about 1.0 × 10 7 molecules cm −3 (Hofzumahaus et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the concentrations of atmospheric oxidant such as ozone are higher at SORPES (Table 1). Moreover, the concentrations of OH and NO 3 radicals in the Yangtze River Delta urban area of China are higher than in the clean area (S. Nan et al, 2017). Third, the concentrations of anthropogenic pollutants and biogenic VOCs are distinctly different at the two stations.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Npf At Smear II and Sorpesmentioning
confidence: 95%