Study on the Influence of FDI on China's Green Innovation in Manufacturing System

Bi, Ke; Wang, Yu Han; Yang, Chao

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.448-453.4571

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although environmental regulation and the relationship between environmental regulation and foreign direct investment (FDI) have significant negative effects on the efficiency of green innovation for patent-intensive manufacturing, the inbound FDI has significant positive effects when considering the wide range of industries. Furthermore, Bi, et al [76] showed that foreign direct investment (FDI), in the form of data, has a negative influence on the human resources that are committed to green innovation in manufacturing, but that it has a positive impact on the green innovation resources of the MGIS outputs. In OECD, Zamir and Mujahid [77] indicated that FDI, green energy consumption, and green innovation technology impact selected sample countries, positively.…”

Section: Effects Of Environmental Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation-Led FDI Sustainability: Clarifying the Nexus between Financial Innovation, Technological Innovation, Environmental Innovation, and FDI in the BRIC Nations

Huan¹,

Qamruzzaman

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Spatial adequacy and capital formation are impactful macro factors in achieving economic sustainability; therefore, offering a conducive ambiance for foreign investors entices them to the technology and capital mobilization in the host economy. The purpose of the study is to highlight the nexus of the innovation-led FDI in BRIC nations from 1990–2019. The study has implemented several econometric techniques to establish the empirical nexus, including a unit root test with a structural break, a combined cointegration test, an augmented autoregressive distributed lagged, a nonlinear autoregressive distributed lagged and the Fourier Toda–Yamamoto causality test. The structural break test divulged one break year in the data set, and the study incorporated the structural break effects in line with the explained variable. The long run association between the explanatory explained and the control variables has been unveiled with the test statistics of the combined cointegration. Furthermore, the long run cointegration in the empirical equation has been found in the linear and nonlinear assessment. In terms of the symmetric investigation, the coefficient of innovation, that is, TI, FI, and EI on FDI, were revealed to be positive and statistically significant at a 1% level, suggesting the innovation culture boosts the inflows of the FDI in the economy, both in the long run and short run. Furthermore, the asymmetric association has been confirmed by implementing the standard Wald test with the null of symmetry in the long and short runs. Inferring to the asymmetric coefficients, it is apparent that the positive and negative shocks of TI, FI and EI have established a positive tie to FDI, which is significant at a 1% level. According to the elasticities of the asymmetric shocks, the positive innovation disclosed a more prominent impact than the negative innovation on the FDI inflows. Thus this study advocated for ensuring a conducive innovation environment by mobilizing economic resources. Finally, the causality test documented the feedback hypothesis to explain the causal association between technological innovation and FDI and environmental innovation and FDI.

show abstract

Section: Effects Of Environmental Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation-Led FDI Sustainability: Clarifying the Nexus between Financial Innovation, Technological Innovation, Environmental Innovation, and FDI in the BRIC Nations

Huan¹,

Qamruzzaman

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The relationship between IFDI and green innovation has been thoroughly studied in the existing literature. For instance, Bi et al [ 42 ] conducted an empirical test on the impact of IFDI inflows on the green innovation capability of China’s manufacturing green innovation system. They found that IFDI inflow has a positive effect on the input of various elements of the green innovation resources, but the IFDI information inflow has inhibited the green innovation human resources; and innovation resource input plays a full intermediary role in the process of IFDI inflow affecting the green innovation capability.…”

Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…IFDI promotes technology spillovers through the demonstration, competition, flow, and correlation effects. IFDI technology spillovers provide important support for corporate green innovation [ 42 ]. From the demonstration effect, IFDI technology spillovers not only bring new equipment, new products and new technologies to local enterprises, but also bring advanced management experience to the host country.…”

Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmental Regulation, Two-Way Foreign Direct Investment, and Green Innovation Efficiency in China’s Manufacturing Industry

Zhao

Zeng

Ming

2018

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper adopts 2009 to 2015 panel data from 27 manufacturing industries in China. A Super-SBM model is used to measure the green innovation efficiency (GIE) of China’s manufacturing industry. A panel data model is then built to systematically examine the impact of environmental regulation (ER) and two-way foreign direct investment (FDI) on the GIE of China’s manufacturing industry under a unified analysis framework. The results are as follows: (1) the overall level of the green innovation efficiency in China’s manufacturing is low, and there is still great potential for improvement. Considering industry heterogeneity, the green innovation efficiency of patent-intensive manufacturing is significantly higher than that of non-patent-intensive manufacturing; (2) in terms of the whole manufacturing industry, ER and the interaction between ER and outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) have significantly negative effects on GIE, OFDI has significantly positive effects on GIE. (3) when considering industry heterogeneity, for patent-intensive manufacturing, ER and the interaction between ER and inward foreign direct investment (IFDI) have significantly negative effects on GIE, while IFDI has significantly positive effect on GIE. For non-patent-intensive manufacturing, ER and the interaction between ER and OFDI have significantly negative effects on GIE, while IFDI and the interaction between ER and IFDI have significantly positive effects on GIE.

show abstract

Empirical Studies on Green Supply Chain Management

Khan

2020

EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study on the Influence of FDI on China's Green Innovation in Manufacturing System

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

Innovation-Led FDI Sustainability: Clarifying the Nexus between Financial Innovation, Technological Innovation, Environmental Innovation, and FDI in the BRIC Nations

Innovation-Led FDI Sustainability: Clarifying the Nexus between Financial Innovation, Technological Innovation, Environmental Innovation, and FDI in the BRIC Nations

Environmental Regulation, Two-Way Foreign Direct Investment, and Green Innovation Efficiency in China’s Manufacturing Industry

Empirical Studies on Green Supply Chain Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About