2012
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.610-613.2701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Water Resources Carrying Capacity in Hefei City

Abstract: Water resources carrying capacity was evaluated by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method after the evaluation index system was constructed according to water resources condition, socio-economic development level and economic structure characteristics in Heifei City. The results showed that development and utilization degree of water resources was high and further development and utilization potential was small. The water resources development potential of city proper was the minimum in all regions and WR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many factors influence the WRCC. Most studies only consider the impact of the amount of water resources, social economy, and ecological environment on WRCC [24][25][26] but ignore the impact of water quality on regional WRCC. This tends to make the calculation of the WRCC too large and fails to reflect the real situation in the study area.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Index Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many factors influence the WRCC. Most studies only consider the impact of the amount of water resources, social economy, and ecological environment on WRCC [24][25][26] but ignore the impact of water quality on regional WRCC. This tends to make the calculation of the WRCC too large and fails to reflect the real situation in the study area.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Index Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu et al Used AHP to study the water environment carrying capacity of Huai'an City from 2005 to 2014 20 , Zhang et al Used a coupled model to study the water environment carrying capacity of Guizhou Province 21 , and Yang et al Predicted the development trend of WRCC in Xi'an City through SD model 22 . Gao et al Analyzed the dynamic changes and influencing factors of WRCC in Hefei city 23 . Others have used the ecological footprint method to quantitatively assess water security 24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is the largest economic and social development scale that water resources can carry, and the other is the maximum carrying capacity of water resources to the existing economic and social development scale. The carrying scale is usually evaluated by system dynamics, conventional trend, and multi-objective analysis methods [11,12], while the carrying capacity is usually evaluated by principal component analysis (PCA), projection pursuit evaluation, analytical hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE), neural network, and machine learning methods [13][14][15]. The establishment of an evaluation indicator system is the first step for WRCCA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is to divide the water resources system into different levels of subsystems which consist of different indicator elements, and these indicators are interconnected or independent from each other by tapping their meanings based on the expert advice [16]. The other is to select indicators according to the fixed-mode of Driving Force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response-Management (DPSIRM) [15,[17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%