2017
DOI: 10.1332/030557315x14502713105886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying public deliberation after the systemic turn: the crucial role for interpretive research

Abstract: Abstract:The recent shift towards a deliberative systems approach suggests understanding public deliberation as a communicative activity occurring in a diversity of spaces. While theoretically attractive, the deliberative systems approach raises a number of methodological questions for empirical social scientists. For example, how to identify multiple communicative sites within a deliberative system, how to study connections between different sites, and how to assess the impact of the broader context on delibe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interpretive research aims to elicit participants' own understandings of social and political phenomena, and to draw on the narratives they tell to make sense of their experience in order to explain outcomes. Interpretive research has been at the forefront of empirical research into deliberative systems because it is well-suited to unpacking the rich features of deliberative practices in context (see Ercan et al, 2017). As such, it is ideally suited to exploring and teasing out the dynamics of an open-ended, organic process like NHSC.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretive research aims to elicit participants' own understandings of social and political phenomena, and to draw on the narratives they tell to make sense of their experience in order to explain outcomes. Interpretive research has been at the forefront of empirical research into deliberative systems because it is well-suited to unpacking the rich features of deliberative practices in context (see Ercan et al, 2017). As such, it is ideally suited to exploring and teasing out the dynamics of an open-ended, organic process like NHSC.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the case of Hilary Clinton along with FPPP is considered. The selection of this research design is further derived from previous researches that have used the same study design and obtained cohesive results (Karpf et al, 2015;Ercan, Hendriks, & Boswell, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizen empowerment is a crucial device in participatory governance (Bevir and Rhodes 2016;Dryzek 2001;Fischer 2012;Fung 2006;Hajer 2009). While policy studies show the indisputable value of citizen empowerment for public participation (Barnes 2008;Hunter 2015;Newman et al 2004) and for democratic policy processes (Dodge 2015;Dryzek 2001;Ercan, Hendriks, and Boswell 2015;Fischer 2009b;Fung 2007;Healey 2015), its postcommunist shape in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) has been only minimally addressed. Some analyses focused on state authorities' top-down activities toward public engagement (see, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%