Style Composition in Action Research Publication

Taking stock of project value creation: A structured literature review with future directions for research and practice

“…The limited application of theories independent of project value creation leaves a clear potential for applying independent theories, and we find it plausible that an increased application of independent theory might enlighten the project value creation field, as we have seen in other research fields (Mathiassen et al, 2012). We also see how Ashurst et al (2008) expand the boundaries by applying the resource-based view to benefits management.…”

“…Direction 4 in Table 5 completes our outline of directions for future research, and the essence of this direction is the limited application of theories that are independent of the research field (Mathiassen et al, 2012): project value creation, which our analysis shows. The limited application of theories independent of project value creation leaves a clear potential for applying independent theories, and we find it plausible that an increased application of independent theory might enlighten the project value creation field, as we have seen in other research fields (Mathiassen et al, 2012).…”

A Systematic Literature Review About the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Autonomous Vehicle Safety

“…The protocol used ( Figure 1) was based on the tasks suggested by [5] [6] for defining the research questions, identification of search string, source selection, study selection criteria, and data mapping. Also, the protocol followed the recommendations of [7], [8], [4] and [9] for extracting, analyzing, interpreting and reporting the literature-based findings.…”

Academic agility in digital innovation research: The case of mobile ICT publications within information systems 2000–2014

“…Whilst most of this research has focused on the impact from IS research to practitioners engaging in digital innovation and to academics in related fields, this paper focuses solely on the feedback loop from the practice of digital innovation and into IS theory and critical debate. This paper is not arguing for full-cycle micro-organisational behaviour research (Chatman and Flynn, 2005), or action research (Mathiassen et al, 2012;Sein et al, 2011) per se, but merely for the strategic necessity for IS to closely follow, if not shape, both the IT artefact (in a sociomaterial sense) and the associated emerging practices within the broader emerging context of digital innovation.…”