2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Su1510 Does Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy (CAC) Significantly Impact Surveillance Interval Recommendations Compared to Standard Colonoscopy (SC)? Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was proposed as a technique to improve cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, and adenoma detection rate. A comparison between standard colonoscopy and cap-assisted colonoscopy was done in patients with adenoma, and the subsequent impact on surveillance interval recommendations was reviewed [7]. Patients were included if they had one of the following: three or more adenomas, adenomas ≥ 1 cm, adenomas with villous features or HGD.…”
Section: Cap-assisted Colonoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proposed as a technique to improve cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, and adenoma detection rate. A comparison between standard colonoscopy and cap-assisted colonoscopy was done in patients with adenoma, and the subsequent impact on surveillance interval recommendations was reviewed [7]. Patients were included if they had one of the following: three or more adenomas, adenomas ≥ 1 cm, adenomas with villous features or HGD.…”
Section: Cap-assisted Colonoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%