Subglandular Breast Augmentation with Textured, Anatomic, Cohesive Silicone Implants

Abstract

Therapeutic, IV.

The Subfascial Approach to Primary and Secondary Breast Augmentation with Autologous Fat Grafting and Form-Stable Implants

“…[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] These implants resemble the natural shape of the breast, granting them wide acceptance by both patients and surgeons.…”

Medical History, Lifestyle, Family History, and Occupational Risk Factors for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas: The InterLymph Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Subtypes Project

“…The chromosomal translocation t(2;5)(p23;q35), which results in the fusion protein NPM-ALK (2), is found specifically in ALCL. A possible link between breast implants and ALCL has also been reported (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). While these risk factors do not explain the majority of PTCLs that arise, they do suggest that PTCL subtypes may have distinct etiologies.…”

Transaxillary Subfascial Augmentation Mammaplasty with Anatomic Form-Stable Silicone Implants

“…[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]48 Despite recent progress in terms of silicone technology, breast implant manufacturers continue to research and make advances in implant design resulting in lower complication rates, better aesthetic outcomes, and more consistent results.…”

“…This silicone gel-filled breast implant is designed with a low-diffusion silicone elastomer shell (IntrasheilÔ barrier technology) and also features a BiocellÔ surface texture, which promotes tissue adherence to reduce implant rotation and capsular contracture. [33][34][35][36][37][38] The Style 410 is available in a wide range of shapes (a matrix involving 12 combinations of implant height and projection ratios that extend across a range of base widths) so that the surgeon can select an implant appropriate to each patient's anatomy.…”

“…12 Silicone breast implants have advanced in recent decades with the introduction of new textures and anatomically shaped implants. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] With advances in implant technology involving different types of textures and gel cohesion, more satisfactory outcomes with lower complication rates can be achieved. Usually, these implants are anatomically shaped with less fullness at the upper pole compared with round implants.…”