2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2020.115839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective and objective quality assessment for image restoration: A critical survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RR method analyzes the image to be evaluated using partial information of the ideal image as a reference. The NR method is based on the statistics of the image, completely free from the dependence on the ideal reference image 33 . In this paper, we focus on the clarity of the fused image, we therefore use the NR method for image quality evaluation.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RR method analyzes the image to be evaluated using partial information of the ideal image as a reference. The NR method is based on the statistics of the image, completely free from the dependence on the ideal reference image 33 . In this paper, we focus on the clarity of the fused image, we therefore use the NR method for image quality evaluation.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this, the difference between the original image and ESRGAN generated images were compared based on several metrics which include mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), universal image quality index (UQI), multi-scale structural similarity index (MSSSIM), erreur relative globale adimensionnelle de synthese (ERGAS), spatial correlation coefficient (SCC), relative average spectral error (RASE) and spectral angle mapper (SAM). [90,91]…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of completeness, we also want to note that several metrics exist that target particularly degraded images (like reconstructions with few projections as used in this work) and relate them to the performance of image restoration methods [103]. While these quality indicators are mostly unsuited for investigations like the one conducted here, in the future some of them might be interesting in modified versions for the assessment of artefact reduction algorithms or image enhancement methods.…”
Section: Image Quality Metrics For Reconstruction Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%