2024
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies

Alexandra Sarafoglou,
Suzanne Hoogeveen,
Don van den Bergh
et al.

Abstract: Many-analysts studies explore how well an empirical claim withstands plausible alternative analyses of the same dataset by multiple, independent analysis teams. Conclusions from these studies typically rely on a single outcome metric (e.g. effect size) provided by each analysis team. Although informative about the range of plausible effects in a dataset, a single effect size from each team does not provide a complete, nuanced understanding of how analysis choices are related to the outcome. We used the Delphi … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
references
References 86 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance