Subsidizing Unit Donations: Matches, Rebates, and Discounts Compared

Diederich, Johannes; Eckel, Catherine C.; Epperson, Raphael; Goeschl, Timo; Grossman, Philip J.

doi:10.11588/heidok.00029236

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Natural experiment-like approaches have been used to study the effect of natural disasters on charitable giving by, among others, Deryugina and Marx (2021). Online experiments to study pro-sociality have been applied by, among others, Chen et al (2010), Diederich et al (2020), and Exley and Petrie (2018) and Goette and Tripodi (2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19 and Pro-Sociality: How Do Donors Respond to Local Pandemic Severity, Increased Salience, and Media Coverage?

Adena

2021

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19 and Pro-Sociality: How Do Donors Respond to Local Pandemic Severity, Increased Salience, and Media Coverage?

Adena

2021

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…5 There are two studies with different designs that achieve equivalence of rebate and matches. The first is in the context of unit donations (Diederich et al, 2020), and the second relies on framing contributions in terms of charity receipts and not refunds ). 6 18.12.2017, Richard R. Thaler, "It's Time to Rethink the Charity Deduction" https://nyti.…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Routledge Handbook of Taxation and Philanthropy

Peter¹,

Lideikyte-Huber²

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Routledge Handbook of Taxation and Philanthropy ventures into a territory that is still widely unexplored. It contains 30 academic contributions that aim to provide a better understanding of whether, why, and how philanthropic initiatives, understood as voluntary contributions for the common good, can and should be fostered by states through tax incentives. The topic has been addressed from a multidisciplinary and multicultural perspective -covering neuroeconomics, sociology, political science, psychology, affective sciences, philosophy, behavioral economy, and law -because of its global and multifaceted nature. It also contains the OECD report on Taxation and Philanthropy released in November 2020, which was prepared in this context as a result of a collaboration with the Geneva Centre for Philanthropy of the University of Geneva.The book is divided into four sections, exploring, respectively, the justification of tax incentives for philanthropy, theoretical and empirical insights about taxes, efficiency and donor behavior in that context, and tax incentives for cross-border philanthropy and for hybrid entities and social entrepreneurship. It is believed that this volume will be a landmark yet only the beginning of a journey in which a lot remains to be studied, learned, and said.

show abstract

“…Natural experiment-like approaches have been used to study the effect of natural disasters on charitable giving by, among others, Deryugina and Marx (2021). Online experiments to study pro-sociality have been applied by, among others, Chen et al (2010), Diederich et al (2020), Exley and Petrie (2018), and Goette and Tripodi (2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%