2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1693(03)00245-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substitution process in phosphine thiopurine palladium complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 13 C{ 1 H} NMR was also in agreement with the proposed composition for 2 . The signal for the S-CH 3 arises at 14.15 ppm that is close to that for 8-MTTH (14.00 ppm). , The 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectrum showed a single signal at −25.19 ppm due to phosphorus-coordinated PTA. Therefore, the spectroscopic data for 2 are similar to the corresponding found in previously reported 8-MTT − complexes where the thiopurine is invariably coordinated by the imidazolic N7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The 13 C{ 1 H} NMR was also in agreement with the proposed composition for 2 . The signal for the S-CH 3 arises at 14.15 ppm that is close to that for 8-MTTH (14.00 ppm). , The 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectrum showed a single signal at −25.19 ppm due to phosphorus-coordinated PTA. Therefore, the spectroscopic data for 2 are similar to the corresponding found in previously reported 8-MTT − complexes where the thiopurine is invariably coordinated by the imidazolic N7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The Ru−Cp centroid distance is 1.865 Å that is larger than that observed in the starting complex [RuCpCl(PTA) 2 ] (Ru−Cp centroid = 1.844 Å) while the bond lengths between the ruthenium atom and both PTA phosphorus atoms (Ru−P1 = 2.266(1) Å; Ru−P2 = 2.272(1) Å) are different to those observed in the starting complex: respectively 2.258(3) Å and 2.247(3) Å. Surprisingly, the 8-MTT − anion is not coordinated by the purine-N7 atom, which was the expected coordination position as observed in most of the until now known crystal structures of purine-metal complexes, but by the purine-thio-ether-S atom. ,, Although there are several examples of bonds between Ru atoms and thioether S atoms, there are only three examples of ruthenium complexes containing nitrogen-thioether ligands, but none of them contains the ligand exclusively coordinated by sulfur. Additionally, there are no examples of complexes containing thioether-purines or other thioethers bearing NH groups, competing for coordination on the metal or stabilizing the S-thio-ether coordination by the formation of a chelate ring.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Raman bands assignable to the stretching of the Pd–P bonds in complex 2 suggest a cis arrangement of the PPh 3 ligands. Several Pd II ‐thionate‐PPh 3 complexes with the phosphane ligands in cis positions have been reported by other research groups, with different coordination forms for the thionate ligands: chelating in [Pd(η 2 ‐N,S‐pym2S)(PPh 3 ) 2 ](ClO 4 ) 9e or [Pd(η 2 ‐N,S‐py2S)(Cl)(PPh 3 )] 9e, 9g; bridging in [Pd(μ 2 ‐N,S‐py2S)(Cl)(PPh 3 )] 2 9d.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%