2003
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful CD34+ cell mobilization by intermediate-dose Ara-C in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with sequential fludarabine and Campath-1H

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, only one out of five patients mobilized with G-CSF alone reached the collection target in this series. Interestingly, cytarabine appeared to be efficient in re-mobilization in this series (success in 5/5 patients) as well in a previous series by Montillo et al 15 (success in 13/14). Further, a recent French trial suggested a higher success rate after DHAP (dexamethasone-cytarabine-cisplatinum) when compared to mobilization with G-CSF alone in fludarabine-treated CLL patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…On the other hand, only one out of five patients mobilized with G-CSF alone reached the collection target in this series. Interestingly, cytarabine appeared to be efficient in re-mobilization in this series (success in 5/5 patients) as well in a previous series by Montillo et al 15 (success in 13/14). Further, a recent French trial suggested a higher success rate after DHAP (dexamethasone-cytarabine-cisplatinum) when compared to mobilization with G-CSF alone in fludarabine-treated CLL patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Tournilhac et al 6 reported a series of 38 CLL patients treated similarly, who were mobilized with filgrastim 10 mg/kg/day, and only 16% achieved the target of 2 Â 10 6 CD34 þ cells/kg bw and repeated mobilizations using the same procedure were likewise effective. A similar inefficiency of G-CSF alone in standard doses (5 mg/kg) was observed by Montillo et al, 10 eight out of 10 CLL patients treated upfront with FLU and Campath-1H failed to mobilize. Furthermore, increasing the dose of G-CSF to 10 mg proved to be an unsuccessful measure.…”
Section: -Test)mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…[4][5][6] The high rate of primary mobilization failures in the whole study group supports this presumption. The rationale for our remobilization strategy was the reported dose-dependent G-CSF efficacy in PBSC mobilization [8][9][10] and avoidance of toxicity of mobilizing chemotherapy. Kobbe et al 8 noted that the higher G-CSF dose was associated with higher levels of CD34 þ cells and a higher percentage of successful collections.…”
Section: -Test)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concern has been raised regarding the ability to mobilize sufficient PBPCs for autografting after purine analogues in AML 32 as well as in lymphoproliferative disorders. 33 However, after conventional FLAG therapy, we previously reported a mobilization rate comparable to that observed in this series in AML with trilinear dysplastic abnormalities; 18 in addition, we cannot exclude the possibility that fludarabine given as CI can result in less impairment of stem cell mobilization capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%