2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-005-3656-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suction Induced Effects on the Fabric of a Structured Soil

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents the mathematical modelling of the modification of the pore space geometry of a structured soil subjected to suction increase. Structured soil concepts are first introduced considering different fabric units, such as aggregates and fissures. The numerical modelling of the structural evolution is based on experimental test results in which the evolution of the structure of the samples subjected to different suctions is determined using the mercury intrusion porosimetry technique. Fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(30 reference statements)
3
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the smaller pores, referred to as intraaggregate pores), as opposed to 'macrostructure' ('the arrangement of the soil aggregates and the relation between the structural units at the aggregate level' [1,22] (i.e. the larger pores referred to as interaggregate pores) or (b) the features of the soil at the particle/aggregate scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the smaller pores, referred to as intraaggregate pores), as opposed to 'macrostructure' ('the arrangement of the soil aggregates and the relation between the structural units at the aggregate level' [1,22] (i.e. the larger pores referred to as interaggregate pores) or (b) the features of the soil at the particle/aggregate scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of this research, recent models describing the water retention of compacted soils (e.g. [13,36]) explicitly accounted for the evolving structure/fabric of the aggregated soil, distinguishing between two levels of structure of aggregated soils: intra-aggregate (micropores) and inter-aggregate (macropores) [1,22]. Despite the extensive research on the SWRC, relatively little is known on the soil water retention behaviour of artificially cemented materials (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first zone corresponds to the interaggregate porosity and the second zone corresponds to the intraaggregate porosity (Romero and Vaunat 2000;Koliji et al 2006). Only low suctions can develop in the interaggregate porosity and the effects of hydromechanical couplings are important in this zone.…”
Section: Behavioural Features Of Water Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSD is an essential fabric element that has been used in geotechnical engineering applications and correlated with macroscopic properties, such as its dependency on the type of compaction for clays (Ahmed et al 1974;Kong et al 2005); the differences between laboratory and field-compacted soils for equivalent dry density and moulding water content (Prapaharan et al 1991;Jommi and Sciotti 2003); the saturated water permeability (GarciaBengochea et al 1979;Juang and Holtz 1986a, b;Lapierre et al 1990); frost-heave properties (Reed et al 1979); and qualitatively with macroscopic volume changes-consolidation- (Delage and Lefebvre 1984;Griffiths and Joshi 1989;Coulon and Bruand 1989;Tessier et al 1992;Qi et al 1996). Regarding unsaturated soils, MIP results have been used to predict the water retention properties (Prapaharan et al 1985;Romero et al 1999;Aung et al 2001;Simms andYanful 2002, 2005); as well as macroscopic volume changes due to the effects of mechanical and hydraulic paths (Al-Mukhtar 1995;Al-Mukhtar et al 1996;Qi et al 1996, Cui et al 2002Simms and Yanful 2004;Cuisinier and Laloui 2004;Lloret et al 2004;Romero et al 2005;Koliji et al 2006b;Hoffmann et al 2007). Observed correlations between the water retention, volume change, and water permeability in unsaturated soils with the PSD as measured by MIP are presented in this report.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%