2015
DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2015.1038661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suitability of analytical methods to measure solubility for the purpose of nanoregulation

Abstract: Solubility is an important physicochemical parameter in nanoregulation. If nanomaterial is completely soluble, then from a risk assessment point of view, its disposal can be treated much in the same way as "ordinary" chemicals, which will simplify testing and characterisation regimes. This review assesses potential techniques for the measurement of nanomaterial solubility and evaluates the performance against a set of analytical criteria (based on satisfying the requirements as governed by the cosmetic regulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All data collected falls into the first category (i.e., dissolution 1-25%; Figure 4). Furthermore, in the studies form literature that were analyzed in our study, only in 50% of the cases data on solubility was provided (Supplement 2), which may be caused by the current challenges to determine solubility of a NM in biological matrices (Tantra et al, 2016). It is evident that more states in the lower dissolution ranges combined with more data (i.e., more cases) will result in a higher contribution of dissolution node to the hazard noted of this BN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data collected falls into the first category (i.e., dissolution 1-25%; Figure 4). Furthermore, in the studies form literature that were analyzed in our study, only in 50% of the cases data on solubility was provided (Supplement 2), which may be caused by the current challenges to determine solubility of a NM in biological matrices (Tantra et al, 2016). It is evident that more states in the lower dissolution ranges combined with more data (i.e., more cases) will result in a higher contribution of dissolution node to the hazard noted of this BN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 An important advantage of AGNES is that it can be applied directly to the dispersion without the need of any previous solid/liquid separation step. 14,15 In this way, it allows a good control over the environmental variables (pH, temperature) as well as a relatively short time of analysis, which is essential for the measurement of dissolution rates. However, up to date, no direct experimental comparison between AGNES and other separation/analysis coupled protocols has been reported.…”
Section: On the Other Hand The Technique Absence Of Gradients And Nementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different separation techniques have been proposed in the literature for this purpose. [13][14][15] One of the most common methods is ultrafiltration (UF), which involves the use of semipermeable filters (typically having pore sizes of 3 kDa) in a centrifugation tube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To some extent, this approach combines intrinsic properties with systemdependent properties and toxicological effects. For example, the solubility of a nanomaterial can be regarded as an intrinsic property, but its dissolution rate is also highly dependent on the environmental conditions (Tantra et al 2016). Detailed subgrouping, especially in the group of active nanomaterials should be amended to this concept, and should be related to mechanisms of action, ideally integrated into the adverse outcome pathway concept (Ankley et al 2010;Becker et al 2015;Riebeling et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%