2013
DOI: 10.5121/ijaia.2013.4509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suitability of Naïve Bayesian Methods for Paragraph Level Text Classification in the Kannada Language using Dimensionality Reduction Technique

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…India is a highly multilingual country with 22 constitutionally recognized languages. Text miningresearcheshavebeenconductedforallthepopularlanguages,i.e., Hindi(Bakliwaletal., 2012;Dutta, Kaushik, & Prakash, 2011;Joshi et al, 2010;Raghuveer & Murthy, 2007), Tamil (Raghuveer&Murthy,2007;Swamy&Hanumanthappa,2013),Telugu(Durga&Govardhan,2011Murthy,2005;Raghuveer&Murthy,2007;Swamy&Hanumanthappa,2013),Kannada (Jayashree, Srikantamurthy,&B.,2013;Raghuveer&Murthy,2007;Swamy&Hanumanthappa,2013),Panjabi (Nidhi&Gupta,2012;Raghuveer&Murthy,2007),andBengali (Mansur,UzZama,&Khan,2006;Raghuveer&Murthy,2007).However,mostoftheresearchersoftextminingontheIndianlanguage haveconductedresearchonlyonthetextcategorization (Jayashree,R.,&Srikanta,2011;Jayashreeet al,2013;Murthy,2005;Raghuveer&Murthy,2007;Swamy&Hanumanthappa,2013).Hence,we findveryfewstudiesonsentimentunearthing (Bakliwaletal.,2012;Joshietal.,2010).Considering theimportanceofdigitalexpression,itsfuturepotential,andapplicabilityoftextminingtechniques, wearguethisastheveryvitalgapintheliterature.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…India is a highly multilingual country with 22 constitutionally recognized languages. Text miningresearcheshavebeenconductedforallthepopularlanguages,i.e., Hindi(Bakliwaletal., 2012;Dutta, Kaushik, & Prakash, 2011;Joshi et al, 2010;Raghuveer & Murthy, 2007), Tamil (Raghuveer&Murthy,2007;Swamy&Hanumanthappa,2013),Telugu(Durga&Govardhan,2011Murthy,2005;Raghuveer&Murthy,2007;Swamy&Hanumanthappa,2013),Kannada (Jayashree, Srikantamurthy,&B.,2013;Raghuveer&Murthy,2007;Swamy&Hanumanthappa,2013),Panjabi (Nidhi&Gupta,2012;Raghuveer&Murthy,2007),andBengali (Mansur,UzZama,&Khan,2006;Raghuveer&Murthy,2007).However,mostoftheresearchersoftextminingontheIndianlanguage haveconductedresearchonlyonthetextcategorization (Jayashree,R.,&Srikanta,2011;Jayashreeet al,2013;Murthy,2005;Raghuveer&Murthy,2007;Swamy&Hanumanthappa,2013).Hence,we findveryfewstudiesonsentimentunearthing (Bakliwaletal.,2012;Joshietal.,2010).Considering theimportanceofdigitalexpression,itsfuturepotential,andapplicabilityoftextminingtechniques, wearguethisastheveryvitalgapintheliterature.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%