2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/6065920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sum Rate Maximization of D2D Communications in Cognitive Radio Network Using Cheating Strategy

Abstract: This paper focuses on the cheating algorithm for device-to-device (D2D) pairs that reuse the uplink channels of cellular users. We are concerned about the way how D2D pairs are matched with cellular users (CUs) to maximize their sum rate. In contrast with Munkres’ algorithm which gives the optimal matching in terms of the maximum throughput, Gale-Shapley algorithm ensures the stability of the system on the same time and achieves a men-optimal stable matching. In our system, D2D pairs play the role of “men,” so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if the transmission power is set based on the criteria node that is selected considering only the distance, then a relatively nearby node with interference level much higher than the criteria node may not achieve the target SINR. Therefore, we propose that Ͼ Ģ is selected based on the weighted sum of the normalized values of the distance between the transmitter and the receivers and the level of interference at the receivers (5). Then, the criteria node will be the node corresponding to the highest weighted sum.…”
Section: ) Criteria Node Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, if the transmission power is set based on the criteria node that is selected considering only the distance, then a relatively nearby node with interference level much higher than the criteria node may not achieve the target SINR. Therefore, we propose that Ͼ Ģ is selected based on the weighted sum of the normalized values of the distance between the transmitter and the receivers and the level of interference at the receivers (5). Then, the criteria node will be the node corresponding to the highest weighted sum.…”
Section: ) Criteria Node Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, higher throughput and access rates can be achieved through spatial reuse of the available resource blocks for D2D communication [2]. However, spatial reuse causes interference among concurrent transmissions which may deteriorate signal quality, thus making interference management a key challenge for D2D communication [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, they maximize the minimum SINR AP and SINR U2 , while satisfying the SINR constraint condition. 35,36 Based on the optimal SINR, U1 and AP can calculate the optimal transmit power, which is given by…”
Section: Ibfd Wireless Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the spectrum reuse pattern in underlay D2D communication, it is usually preferred to reuse the uplink spectrum of cellular users, because the transmission power for base station (BS) is relatively high, which is more likely to cause serious interference in D2D communication. 13 Through power control and resource allocation algorithms, not only the interference caused by D2D can be effectively suppressed, but also the spectrum utilization and energy efficiency can be significantly improved. Given this background, Sheng et al 14 investigate the tradeoff between energy efficiency and communication delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the underlay mode, the key issue is the interference coordination between the cellular user and the D2D pair. Within the spectrum reuse pattern in underlay D2D communication, it is usually preferred to reuse the uplink spectrum of cellular users, because the transmission power for base station (BS) is relatively high, which is more likely to cause serious interference in D2D communication 13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%