2018
DOI: 10.1111/maps.13134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summanen, a new meteorite impact structure in Central Finland

Abstract: The Summanen structure (62°39.0′N, 25°22.5′E) is located within the Paleoproterozoic Central Finland Granite Belt, Fennoscandian Shield. The structure is hidden under Lake Summanen and not directly observable. It owes its discovery to low‐altitude airborne geophysical data, which revealed a circular, ~2.6 km wide electromagnetic in‐phase, and resistivity, anomalies. Two field campaigns were conducted in 2017 to search for impact signatures. The fieldwork concentrated on the southeastern side of the lake follow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After several hundred Myr, this crater (dashed circle) is vaguely recognizable by its morphology, and most of the impact crater geology is known from drillings (Grieve, 1978(Grieve, , 2006. (H) Satellite image of the recently discovered *2.6 km-diameter Summanen impact structure in Finland of uncertain age (Plado et al, 2018). After perhaps hundreds of millions of years of exposure, the crater (dashed circle) has been significantly overprinted by erosion, sedimentary infill, and glaciation and is today concealed by a lake.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After several hundred Myr, this crater (dashed circle) is vaguely recognizable by its morphology, and most of the impact crater geology is known from drillings (Grieve, 1978(Grieve, , 2006. (H) Satellite image of the recently discovered *2.6 km-diameter Summanen impact structure in Finland of uncertain age (Plado et al, 2018). After perhaps hundreds of millions of years of exposure, the crater (dashed circle) has been significantly overprinted by erosion, sedimentary infill, and glaciation and is today concealed by a lake.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such low‐relief magnetic zones have resulted in the identification of several smaller ancient impact structures, such as Summanen in Fennoscandia (Plado et al. 2018). The weak relief is related to a variety of possible causes including shock‐induced demagnetization of rocks in the crater, the random distribution of magnetic vectors due to chaotic displacements related to the cratering process, oxidization of magnetite, and the deposition of postimpact sediments with a weak magnetization.…”
Section: Geophysical Surveying Of Impact Cratersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure was initially discovered using low‐altitude airborne geophysical data, which revealed circular electromagnetic in‐phase and resistivity anomalies 2.6 km in diameter (Lerssi et al., 2007). Further field campaigns and laboratory studies conducted in 2017 led to the discovery of erratic boulders containing shatter cones and planar deformation features (PDFs), indicating that the Summanen structure represents an old, eroded impact structure (Plado et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) Bedrock map (© Geological Survey of Finland) of Summanen after Nironen (2003). The dashed ring outlines the aeroelectromagnetic anomaly (AEM), 2.6 km in diameter (Plado et al., 2018). Shatter cone findings, multifrequency deep sounding electromagnetic (FrEM), and gravity profiles are shown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation