2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sunburst pattern by kinetic segregation in core-shell nanowires: A phase-field study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This broadly explains why these are not observed in most previous low P containing GaAsP and low Al containing AlGaAs growths [6,7]. It may also be the reason for the inclined facet's lack of prominence and definition in the current sample compared to those in the thicker AlAs shells [26] and their simulations [27]. The preference shown in formation of secondary bands in nanowires with relatively larger diameters (within the range observed) (see Fig.…”
Section: Nano-facet Formation At the Alternating Verticessupporting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This broadly explains why these are not observed in most previous low P containing GaAsP and low Al containing AlGaAs growths [6,7]. It may also be the reason for the inclined facet's lack of prominence and definition in the current sample compared to those in the thicker AlAs shells [26] and their simulations [27]. The preference shown in formation of secondary bands in nanowires with relatively larger diameters (within the range observed) (see Fig.…”
Section: Nano-facet Formation At the Alternating Verticessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…xs [27]. This aspect makes the real growth more complex and interdependent, together with the above discussed points, well explaining the difficulty seen in formation and continuation of the secondary P rich bands.…”
Section: Effect Of Growth Parameters and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…See, for example, the discussion in Backofen et al 25 . In fact, several simulations for realistic applications in materials science consider this model—see, for example, other studies 26‐38 —and claim that their large‐scale simulations would not be feasible without the additional degeneracy. The drawback of this DDCH model, which is termed RRV model in several publications, 22,31,36 is that it is nonvariational.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%