2018
DOI: 10.17576/jsm-2018-4703-03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sunda Scops-Owl Density Estimation via Distance Sampling and Call Playback

Abstract: Nocturnal birds in the tropics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight of these were placed within the estimated area of distribution of the owl, whereas two transects were placed in its vicinity, in areas of native forest, with occupancy potential (Freitas et al 2023). Point counts within the transects were considered independent and used as sampling units as they were spaced 150 m apart in order to prevent double counting, similarly to what has been used for other owl species in similar environments (Borges et al 2004;Pilla et al 2018). This distance also takes into account the inability of AudioMoths to capture owl calls at 96 m of distance (BF pers.…”
Section: Survey Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight of these were placed within the estimated area of distribution of the owl, whereas two transects were placed in its vicinity, in areas of native forest, with occupancy potential (Freitas et al 2023). Point counts within the transects were considered independent and used as sampling units as they were spaced 150 m apart in order to prevent double counting, similarly to what has been used for other owl species in similar environments (Borges et al 2004;Pilla et al 2018). This distance also takes into account the inability of AudioMoths to capture owl calls at 96 m of distance (BF pers.…”
Section: Survey Designmentioning
confidence: 99%