2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sunitinib dosing schedule 2/1 improves tolerability, efficacy, and health-related quality of life in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[20][21][22][23][24] Three ongoing prospective studies (NCT02060370, NCT02689167, and NCT02398552) will further evaluate the value of the two/ one schedule. It is important to note that based on the dose/schedule distribution (Table 1) in our individualization study, the two/ one schedule was optimal in only 39 (37%) patients.…”
Section: Changing the Schedule From Four/two To Two/one May Not Optimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23][24] Three ongoing prospective studies (NCT02060370, NCT02689167, and NCT02398552) will further evaluate the value of the two/ one schedule. It is important to note that based on the dose/schedule distribution (Table 1) in our individualization study, the two/ one schedule was optimal in only 39 (37%) patients.…”
Section: Changing the Schedule From Four/two To Two/one May Not Optimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a retrospective analysis of patients with mRCC in China, data were reviewed from 108 patients treated with first-line sunitinib in one of three regimens -a four/two schedule (n=50), a transitional schedule starting with a four/ two schedule and switching to a two/one schedule due to toxicity (n=26), and an initial two/one schedule (n=32). 8 AEs, including hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, diarrhea, and bone marrow suppression, were significantly less common in both the transitional four/two to two/one schedule and the initial two/one schedule than in the four/two schedule (p<0.05). HRQOL, measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) scores, did not differ significantly among the three groups during the first two treatment cycles; however, HRQOL declined significantly less during Cycles 3-9 in the group treated initially with a two/one schedule, than among those treated with either a four/two schedule or the transitional schedule.…”
Section: Henry Jacob Conter MD Mscmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Several studies, however, including the RAINBOW, RESTORE (randomized phase II trial of sunitinib four weeks on and two weeks off vs. two weeks on and one week off in metastatic clear-cell type renal cell carcinoma), and single-center studies, have investigated sunitinib on schedule 2/1 or other alternative schedules (in both Western and Asian patients with advanced RCC). The results from these studies suggest that schedule 2/1 might have an improved safety profile compared with schedule 4/2 but with similar efficacy [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. Patients experiencing AEs with schedule 4/2 might tolerate treatment better when switched to schedule 2/1.…”
Section: Dose and Schedulementioning
confidence: 95%