1976
DOI: 10.1063/1.3023508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sunspots and earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, the p ‐values listed in Tables and do not support rejection of the null hypothesis of no solar‐terrestrial triggering of earthquakes. This evaluation is more quantitative than the assertion by Meeus [] that sunspots and earthquakes are not significantly correlated. In general terms, our analysis is also consistent with Jeffreys [], who did not find any significant 11 year solar‐cycle modulation in seismicity, and it is consistent with the analysis of Michael [], who found that the occurrence of large earthquakes is statistically indistinguishable from a time‐stationary Poisson process (no clustering, no modulation, no trend).…”
Section: χ2 and Student's Hypothesis Testsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taken together, the p ‐values listed in Tables and do not support rejection of the null hypothesis of no solar‐terrestrial triggering of earthquakes. This evaluation is more quantitative than the assertion by Meeus [] that sunspots and earthquakes are not significantly correlated. In general terms, our analysis is also consistent with Jeffreys [], who did not find any significant 11 year solar‐cycle modulation in seismicity, and it is consistent with the analysis of Michael [], who found that the occurrence of large earthquakes is statistically indistinguishable from a time‐stationary Poisson process (no clustering, no modulation, no trend).…”
Section: χ2 and Student's Hypothesis Testsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The statistical significance of a possible correlation between sunspots and seismicity has occasionally been questioned [e.g., Jeffreys , ; Meeus , ], and for certain geographic regions, correlation between solar‐terrestrial variables and seismicity has actually been shown to be insignificant [e.g., Stothers , ; Yesugey , ]. Still, reports that identify such correlations continue to be published, especially lately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of possible relation of solar activity and the Earth seismicity is discussed over 170 years [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], and references therein. Despite a fairly large number of publications devoted to research of the possible influence of the Sun on seismic processes, a final conclusion about a possibility of triggering earthquakes (EQs) by solar flares (SFs) or geomagnetic storms has not yet been made.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Поиск солнечно-земных связей, приводящих к инициированию землетрясений, продолжается до сих пор. Делаются попытки связать сейсмическую активность с числом солнечных пятен (числом Вольфа) [Wolf, 1853;Simpson, 1967;Gribbin, 1971;Meeus, 1976;Odintsov et al, 2006;Tavarez, Azevedo, 2011], геомагнитными бурями [Соболев и др., 2001;Закржевская, Соболев, 2002;Urata et al, 2018;Соболев, 2021], Sq-вариациями геомагнитного поля [Duma, Ruzhin, 2003;Rabeh et al, 2010], геомагнитными джерками [Florindo, Alfonsi, 1995;Florindo et al, 1996], солнечным ветром [Tarasov, 2021], плотностью потоков высокоэнергетических частиц [Shestopalov, Kharin, 2014;Marchitelli et al, 2020] и солнечными вспышками [Соболев и др., 1998;Sorokin et al, 2019;Novikov et al, 2020]. Полученные к настоящему времени результаты такого поиска являются нечеткими, в некоторых случаях -противоположными, и, как утверждается в работах [Love, Thomas, 2013;Akhoondzadeh, De Santis, 2022], до сих пор не была продемонстрирована ни одна статистически значимая корреляция глобальной сейсмичности с одним из указанных выше внешних электромагнитных воздействий.…”
unclassified