2005
DOI: 10.1021/jp0521353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercritical Carbon Dioxide:  An Inert Solvent for Catalytic Hydrogenation?

Abstract: Various surface species originating from the reaction between CO2 and H2 over Al2O3-supported Pt, Pd, Rh, and Ru model catalysts were investigated by attenuated total reflection infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy under high-pressure conditions. Two different spectroscopic cells were used: a variable-volume view cell equipped with ATR-crystal and transmission IR windows (batch reactor) and a continuous-flow cell also equipped with a reflection element for ATR-IR spectroscopy. The study corroborated that CO formatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the competitive adsorption of CO 2 and phenol is important, the catalyst deactivation should occur shortly after the start of reaction at any CO 2 pressures since the adsorption usually reaches its equilibrium rapidly irrespective of the pressure. It was previously reported that the amount of adsorbed CO produced from CO 2 gradually increased with time [37,40]. This can explain the induction period for the complete deactivation of Rh/Al 2 O 3 catalyst.…”
Section: Influence Of Pressurized Co 2 On Phenol Hydrogenationmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If the competitive adsorption of CO 2 and phenol is important, the catalyst deactivation should occur shortly after the start of reaction at any CO 2 pressures since the adsorption usually reaches its equilibrium rapidly irrespective of the pressure. It was previously reported that the amount of adsorbed CO produced from CO 2 gradually increased with time [37,40]. This can explain the induction period for the complete deactivation of Rh/Al 2 O 3 catalyst.…”
Section: Influence Of Pressurized Co 2 On Phenol Hydrogenationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…11) that the adsorbed CO was produced from CO 2 -H 2 , although no gaseous CO was detected in the gas phase after the hydrogenation runs in the presence of CO 2 . Several research groups reported, by FTIR (not in situ), the formation of adsorbed CO from CO 2 -H 2 mixtures via reverse water gas shift reaction over Pt [37][38][39][40], Rh [40], Ru [40,41], and Pd [40,41] catalysts even at such a low temperatures as 323 K. Some authors have also shown that adsorbed CO suppresses hydrogenation of ethyl pyruvate over Pt/Al 2 O 3 [38] and dechlorination of chloroaniline over Pt/C [39]. Hence, the formation and adsorption of CO should retard the phenol hydrogenation by blocking Rh active site.…”
Section: Influence Of Pressurized Co 2 On Phenol Hydrogenationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The FTIR of CO adsorbed on the catalysts was made in the presence of organic substrate (phenol or cyclohexanone) and/or water to examine the competitive adsorption of substrate vapor, water vapor, and CO on the catalysts. Generally, CO could be formed in hydrogenation reactions in the presence of dense phase CO 2 and H 2 at high pressures and would affect the outcome of these reactions [16][17][18]. Fig.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%