1996
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.54.r9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superelastic electron scattering on lithium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy with experiment here undermines the basic building blocks of such theories. For this reason it is imperative that this problem be resolved as soon as possible" [1]. This quote is typical of a number made by various authors in recent years and it would be difficult for the present authors to put the present experimental study more vividly in context.…”
Section: S-2p Excitation Of Atomic Hydrogen By Electron Impact Studimentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The discrepancy with experiment here undermines the basic building blocks of such theories. For this reason it is imperative that this problem be resolved as soon as possible" [1]. This quote is typical of a number made by various authors in recent years and it would be difficult for the present authors to put the present experimental study more vividly in context.…”
Section: S-2p Excitation Of Atomic Hydrogen By Electron Impact Studimentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Further, the line strength of these transitions enables efficient excitation of atoms to the P-state. Subsequent to the studies on sodium, the Flinders group has published data for lithium and potassium (Karaganov et al 1996, Stockman et al 1998. Excellent agreement with CCC calculations was again achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…At both 25 • and 30 • , the deviation is mostly caused by the measured P 3 , which significantly deviates from the theoretical prediction. The significance of these low values of P + is not clear as the source of the discrepancy for P 3 is not yet understood.…”
Section: Sourcementioning
confidence: 96%