2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supermassive stars as a source of abundance anomalies of proton-capture elements in globular clusters

Abstract: We propose that the abundance anomalies of proton-capture elements in globular clusters, such as the C-N, Na-O, Mg-Al and Na-F anti-correlations, were produced by super-massive stars with M ∼ 10 4 M ⊙ . Such stars could form in the runaway collisions of massive stars that sank to the cluster centre as a result of dynamical friction, or via the direct monolithic collapse of the low-metallicity gas cloud from which the cluster formed. To explain the observed abundance anomalies, we assume that the supermassive s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

7
277
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
277
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This last implication is however in conflict with observations of the number ratio of GC and field stars in nearby dwarf galaxies (Fornax, WLM, IKN), which suggest that GCs in these systems could not have been more than about five times more massive initially (Larsen et al 2012(Larsen et al , 2014. In addition to the two sources of enriched material mentioned above, super-massive stars with M ∼ 10 4 M have also been considered as polluters to explain the detailed abundance patterns observed in GCs (Denissenkov & Hartwick 2014;Denissenkov et al 2015). Bastian et al (2013) also proposed a scenario that does not invoke multiple generations of stars, and in which the enriched material is released by massive interacting binaries (de Mink et al 2009) and accreted onto the circumstellar discs of low-mass pre-main sequence stars from the same stellar generation (although see Wijnen et al 2016, which highlights important limitations regarding the efficiency of such an accretion process).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This last implication is however in conflict with observations of the number ratio of GC and field stars in nearby dwarf galaxies (Fornax, WLM, IKN), which suggest that GCs in these systems could not have been more than about five times more massive initially (Larsen et al 2012(Larsen et al , 2014. In addition to the two sources of enriched material mentioned above, super-massive stars with M ∼ 10 4 M have also been considered as polluters to explain the detailed abundance patterns observed in GCs (Denissenkov & Hartwick 2014;Denissenkov et al 2015). Bastian et al (2013) also proposed a scenario that does not invoke multiple generations of stars, and in which the enriched material is released by massive interacting binaries (de Mink et al 2009) and accreted onto the circumstellar discs of low-mass pre-main sequence stars from the same stellar generation (although see Wijnen et al 2016, which highlights important limitations regarding the efficiency of such an accretion process).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In this scenario, chemical abundances between the two generations are different because chemical abundances of gas ejected from fast-rotating massive stars (e.g., Decressin et al 2007), supermassive stars (e.g., Denissenkov & Hartwick 2014), massive interacting binaries (e.g., Bastian et al 2013), and AGB stars (e.g.,D08) are quite different from the averaged ones of FG stars. This scenario has been suggested to have a number of serious problems in explaining the fundamental properties of GCs, for example, the larger fraction of SG stars in GCs with multiple stellar populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this general framework, four main scenarios have been proposed, differing mainly in the nature of the polluters: (i) asymptotic giant branch stars (D'Ercole et al 2008), (ii) fastrotating massive stars (Decressin et al 2007), (iii) interacting massive binary stars (De Mink et al 2009), and (iv) supermassive stars (Denissenkov & Hartwick 2014;Denissenkov et al 2015). An alternative scenario that does not require an age difference between first-and secondgeneration stars is the so-called early disk accretion scenario (Bastian et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%