2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/abcaa5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superresolution Reconstruction of Severely Undersampled Point-spread Functions Using Point-source Stacking and Deconvolution

Abstract: Point-spread function (PSF) estimation in spatially undersampled images is challenging because large pixels average fine-scale spatial information. This is problematic when fine-resolution details are necessary, as in optimal photometry where knowledge of the illumination pattern beyond the native spatial resolution of the image may be required. Here, we introduce a method of PSF reconstruction where point sources are artificially sampled beyond the native resolution of an image and combined together via stack… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these optimistic values, we take 𝜎 N = 3 × 10 −20 erg s −1 cm −2 sr −1 Hz −17 for SPHEREx, and 𝜎 N = 1.5 × 10 −21 erg s −1 cm −2 sr −1 Hz −1 for CDIM Heneka et al (2017). We do expect the nominal values to be the more realistic values measured, but better thermal noise values are possible given certain instrument assumptions (Doré et al 2018;Symons et al 2021). Eq.…”
Section: Thermal Noise Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these optimistic values, we take 𝜎 N = 3 × 10 −20 erg s −1 cm −2 sr −1 Hz −17 for SPHEREx, and 𝜎 N = 1.5 × 10 −21 erg s −1 cm −2 sr −1 Hz −1 for CDIM Heneka et al (2017). We do expect the nominal values to be the more realistic values measured, but better thermal noise values are possible given certain instrument assumptions (Doré et al 2018;Symons et al 2021). Eq.…”
Section: Thermal Noise Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given external source catalogs with high astrometric accuracy, we can stack on a sub-pixel basis and reconstruct the average source profile at scales finer than the native pixel size. This "sub-pixel stacking" technique has been used in previous CIBER imager analyses (Bock et al 2013;Zemcov et al 2014), and further investigated recently in the context of optimal photometry (Symons et al 2021). We summarize the sub-pixel stacking procedure as follows:…”
Section: Simulation Catalog-micecatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pixel function is a matrix with each element proportional to the counts where the subpixel and the center sub-pixel that contains the source are within the same native pixel. The position of the center sub-pixel within the native pixel a uniform probability distribution, and therefore when stacking on a large number of sources, the pixel function converges to the analytic form (Symons et al 2021):…”
Section: Simulation Catalog-micecatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average PSF is measured in each flight independently by stacking on DSS star positions with 7 < M AB < 9. As the NBS design under-samples the PSF significantly, the stack is done on a sub-pixel grid, applying the technique implemented in Symons et al (2021).…”
Section: Bright Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%