Supply chain decision based on green investment subsidy and risk aversion

Liu, Pengfei; Yu, Shasha; Lin, Zigan

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0293924

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Interestingly, several studies have introduced risk aversion into green supply chains to analyze its impact on green development and found that risk aversion is detrimental to the greening process of supply chains [36]. However, in the case of government subsidies, risk aversion positively affects green investments [37]. The second stream of research on risk management focuses on how consumers' risk-averse behavior influences enterprise performance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pricing Decisions in Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Supply Chains under Carbon Tax Scenarios

Zhang,

Chen,

Peng

et al. 2024

Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pricing decisions for construction and demolition waste recycling are severely hampered by consumer uncertainty in assessing the value of recycled building materials. This paper uses a construction and demolition waste (CDW) recycling utilization model that consists of a building materials manufacturer and a building materials remanufacturer and compares both the prices and the profits under different carbon tax scenarios, i.e., consumer risk-averse and risk-neutral scenarios. The main conclusions are as follows. (1) The optimal price of traditional products is always negatively correlated with consumer risk aversion. Unlike traditional products, the optimal price of recycled building materials is negatively related to the degree of consumer risk aversion in the case of a low carbon tax; the opposite conclusion is obtained in the case of a high carbon tax. (2) When the abatement cost coefficient is below the threshold and the carbon tax is low, the profits of the building materials manufacturer and remanufacturer show a U-shaped trend with consumer risk aversion; in the case of a high carbon tax, the profits of the two enterprises are positively correlated with consumer risk aversion. In addition, when the abatement cost coefficient is above the threshold, there is an interval in which the profits of the building materials manufacturer are positively correlated with consumer risk aversion in the case in which the carbon tax satisfies this interval. In all the other cases, there is a U-shaped trend in profits and consumer risk aversion levels for both the building materials manufacturer and the remanufacturer.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pricing Decisions in Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Supply Chains under Carbon Tax Scenarios

Zhang,

Chen,

Peng

et al. 2024

Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Pricing policies of dual-channel green supply chain: considering manufacturers’ dual behavioural preferences and government subsidies

Xiao,

Gao,

Zhang

et al. 2024

International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on Emission Reduction Decisions in Supply Chains Considering Vertical Spillover Effects and Low-Carbon Preferences

Lin,

Liu

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The growth in carbon emissions is increasingly exacerbating global warming. As the principal source of carbon emissions, companies can effectively enhance their emission reduction levels through the vertical spillover of emission reduction technologies to investigate the impact of vertical spillover rates, consumers’ low-carbon preference coefficients, emission reduction cost coefficients on optimal supply chain decisions, and profits in centralized and decentralized decision-making environments. Considering consumers’ preferences for low-carbon options, this paper constructs a Stackelberg game model under centralized and decentralized supply chain decision-making scenarios. It examines the effects of considering the vertical spillover effects of emission reduction versus not taking them into account. Using backward induction, this study optimizes the emission reduction levels of leading suppliers and manufacturers. The results indicate that an increase in consumers’ low-carbon preference levels and vertical spillover rate not only enhances the emission reduction levels of suppliers and manufacturers but also increases their profits. Conversely, an increase in emission reduction cost coefficients impedes emission reductions, with a more pronounced effect under vertical spillover conditions. In centralized decision-making, increases in vertical spillover rates, consumers’ low-carbon preferences, and decreases in emission reduction cost coefficients create a synergistic effect, resulting in greater increases in emission reduction levels and profits for suppliers and manufacturers compared to the sum of the effects of changes in individual coefficients. This finding provides new insights for governments in formulating relevant policies to promote corporate emission reductions.

show abstract

Supply chain decision based on green investment subsidy and risk aversion

Cited by 3 publications

References 48 publications

Pricing Decisions in Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Supply Chains under Carbon Tax Scenarios

Pricing Decisions in Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Supply Chains under Carbon Tax Scenarios

Pricing policies of dual-channel green supply chain: considering manufacturers’ dual behavioural preferences and government subsidies

Research on Emission Reduction Decisions in Supply Chains Considering Vertical Spillover Effects and Low-Carbon Preferences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About