2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply chain leadership driven strategic resilience capabilities management: A leader-member exchange perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
4
54
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Li et al (2017) found that supply chain alertness positively impacts the firms' financial performance as a dimension of resilience. In a recent study, Shin and Park (2021) reported the importance of the leadership responsibility in managing the relationships through the O&SCM, considering disruptions context. The authors identified that the alertness exerts a positive effect on the supply chain resilience improvement.…”
Section: Hypotheses and Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Li et al (2017) found that supply chain alertness positively impacts the firms' financial performance as a dimension of resilience. In a recent study, Shin and Park (2021) reported the importance of the leadership responsibility in managing the relationships through the O&SCM, considering disruptions context. The authors identified that the alertness exerts a positive effect on the supply chain resilience improvement.…”
Section: Hypotheses and Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lead firm influencing actions and behaviours of supply chain members to improve capabilities. 46 Rather than raising maturity level generally, it is important to align improvement in capability with the actual risk exposure to ensure investments are proportionate, i.e., through matching the level of risk and vulnerability with appropriate capability to focus investment and effort on actual resilience gaps. 47 This concept of a balanced resilience has also been extended to include the supply chain network.…”
Section: Building Collaborationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leader in collaborative networks and its main attributes. Most of the leadership studies in interorganizational settings tried to address leaders as focal firms mostly in a dyadic buyer-supplier relationship (e.g., [Mokhtar et al, 2019a;Shin, Park, 2021]). In addition, leadership studies at the network level of the analysis demonstrate inconsistent definitions using non-homogenous attributes for defining and characterizing leaders.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the growing attention and studies devoted to the leader in an interorganizational setting, the term is characterized by relatively inconsistent definitions with non-homogeneous attributes and measurements which lead to a rather incoherent picture of leader for identification [Müller-Seitz, Sydow, 2012;Mokhtar et al, 2019b]. Previous studies also do not explicitly focus on identifying leaders in networks and have targeted dyads in a buyer-supplier relationship and a focal company as a leader (e.g., [Mokhtar et al, 2019a;Shin, Park, 2021]). Further, leadership studies in an interorganizational context have paid little attention to the heterarchical networks, i.e., consisting of more or less independent partners without a formally legitimated leading position such as collaborative networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%