2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12525-017-0253-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply chains and electronic markets - impulses for value co-creation across the disciplines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blockchain technologies can change the actor structure within supply chains. Synergies exist between information management and SCM for designing a modern supply chain for Industry 4.0 [97]. In Industry 4.0, blockchain can operate as the ledger and provide cryptocurrencies for fast and frictionless financial transactions between different components of smart factories, suppliers, and even customers [98].…”
Section: Industry 40mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blockchain technologies can change the actor structure within supply chains. Synergies exist between information management and SCM for designing a modern supply chain for Industry 4.0 [97]. In Industry 4.0, blockchain can operate as the ledger and provide cryptocurrencies for fast and frictionless financial transactions between different components of smart factories, suppliers, and even customers [98].…”
Section: Industry 40mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A unit of analysis refers to the part or unit of a social system that one studies (Neuman, 2006). Scholars have criticized the IOIS literature for focusing only on the organization as the unit of analysis (e.g., Lyytinen & Damsgaard, 2011;Prockl, Bhakoo, & Wong, 2017). Studies that use this unit of analysis examine, for instance, whether an organization adopts one or more IOIS without differentiating what IOIS it uses with what (types of) trading partners (e.g., Kshetri, 2007;Kurnia et al, 2015).…”
Section: Unit Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital platforms might bring transparency and complementary relationships among actors, as well as resolve power asymmetries and the coordination power of focal actors. Whereas, SCM is typically dominated by a top-down view from the focal firm to its dyadic partners [35], digital platforms are more prone to a bottom-up approach of an ecosystems view. The digitization of supply chains creates areas of conflict, as the common governance structures of supply chains change.…”
Section: Limitation and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%