2020
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2020.3026724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support Vector Machine Versus Random Forest for Remote Sensing Image Classification: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Abstract: Several machine-learning algorithms have been proposed for remote sensing image classification during the past two decades. Among these machine learning algorithms, Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) have drawn attention to image classification in several remote sensing applications. This paper reviews RF and SVM concepts relevant to remote sensing image classification and applies a meta-analysis of 251 peer-reviewed journal papers. A database with more than 40 quantitative and qualitative fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
313
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 642 publications
(325 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
(147 reference statements)
6
313
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many supervised classification algorithms, such as the maximum likelihood, single linkage, Mahalanobis distance, support vector machines and random forests. Among them, support vector machines (SVMs) and random forests (RFs) have been widely used in recent years, as they typically offer superior classification [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Compared with traditional statistical theory, SVMs with simple structures and strong generalization ability can solve a large number of small-sample learning problems [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many supervised classification algorithms, such as the maximum likelihood, single linkage, Mahalanobis distance, support vector machines and random forests. Among them, support vector machines (SVMs) and random forests (RFs) have been widely used in recent years, as they typically offer superior classification [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Compared with traditional statistical theory, SVMs with simple structures and strong generalization ability can solve a large number of small-sample learning problems [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed approach consists of two main steps: (i) slum area extraction from high-resolution satellite images using We used the Support Vector Machine (SVM) method as the main classifier to extract the deprived/slum areas from the high-resolution satellite images. SVM is a kernel-based non-parametric supervised machine learning algorithm, which is widely used for image classification tasks and produces reliable results [55][56][57]. SVM splits and groups the data by identifying a single linear boundary in its basic form.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The random forest method is a powerful classification scheme proposed by Breiman [56], which has been successfully used in various LULC classification projects [53,[57][58][59][60][61]. As pointed out by Sheykhmousa et al [57], the main advantage of RF is that it can provide very high classification results, and in addition this algorithm is robust to outliers and works well in noisy environments [53]. The working mechanism for RF can be summed up as follows: first, using the LULC training samples, this algorithm separates the training samples into subsets with the use of the bagging technique [62].…”
Section: Landsat Image Classification and Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%