Supporting alternative organizations? Exploring scholars’ involvement in the performativity of worker-recuperated enterprises

Esper, Susana C.; Cabantous, Laure; Barin‐Cruz, Luciano; Gond, Jean‐Pascal

doi:10.1177/1350508417713218

Cited by 36 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On the one hand, the majority of studies in this area are interested in alternative organizational forms that accept and embrace market-based principles such as social businesses (Yunus, Moingeon & Lehmann-Ortega, 2010; Yunus, Dalsace, Menasce & Faivre Tavignot 2015), B-Corporations (Kim, Karlesky, Myers & Schifeling, 2016;Sttubs, 2017) or social entrepreneurship ventures (Drayton & Budinich, 2010). On the other hand, there has been a recent emergence of a series of studies have been contributing to the debate of alternative economies (Zanoni, Contu, Healy & Mir, 2017), focusing on the development of worker cooperatives (Bretos & Errasti, 2017;Esper, Cabantous, Barin Cruz & Gond, 2017).…”

Section: Current Debate On Organizing Alternatives To Capitalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…•Balancing social mission with financial survival (Dawson & Daniel, 2010;Smith et al, 2013;Belz, Binder & Katharina, 2017) •Hybrid organizations and multiple logics (Battilana & Dorado, 2010;Pache & Santos, 2013;Jay, 2013;Gonin & Besharov, 2013) Creation of cooperatives as a form that challenges some of the fundamental principles of Osterwalder, 2016) Incubation/Stabilize business model (Nicolopoulou, Karatas-Ozkan, Vas & Nouman, 2017) Scaling alternative organizations (Seelos & Mair, 2017) Alternative economies (Zanoni, Contu, Healy & Mir, 2017;Bretos & Errasti, 2017;Esper, Cabantous, Barin Cruz & Gond, 2017) Objectives (Stephan et al, 2016) Power relations and the use of the poor and marginalized groups as a new market (Paranque & Willmott, 2014;Griffits, 2012) Benefits of developing grassroots ventures, based on democratic participation principles and collective property rights (Cheney et. all, 2014;Jaumier, 2017) Figure 1 -Future research directions: the key relationships in organizing alternative forms…”

Section: Areas Of Research Incremental Alternatives Fundamental Altermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We believe that a better understanding of the role and influence of Universities in organizing alternatives could open a productive field of research in this field, particularly approaches that extend beyond mere economic value in a conventional sense to embrace societal concerns and 'public value' (see Brewer 2013; Delbridge 2014). Several examples have demonstrated the role of Engineering (Leca, Gond & Barin Cruz, 2014), Philosophy (Esper, Cabantous, Barin Cruz & Gond, 2017), or Business Schools (Reedy & Learmonth, 2009) in the creation, support and maintenance of alternative organizational forms. We see lots of potential in the development of solid theory around the practices of 'reflexive scholars' (Freire, 1970), 'engaged scholarship' (King & Learmouth, 2015) or 'activist scholars' (Contu, 2009) pushing for teaching and researching activities around alternative organizational forms.…”

Section: Organizing Alternatives As Relations With Universitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such initiatives and organizations can be broadly labeled as 'incrementally alternative', such as the emergence of the B-Corp System organizations, which comprises 1,700 organizations worldwide (Gehman & Grimes, 2016) and is very close to the traditional model, or the recent interest in the United Kingdom in the 'Purposeful Company' (http:// www.biginnovationcentre.com/purposeful-company). However, others appear to fundamentally challenge some of the main features of the forprofit model, such as worker cooperatives (Leca, Gond & Barin Cruz, 2014;Esper, Cabantous, Barin Cruz & Gond, 2017) in which collective ownership and decision making is central.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Next steps in organizing alternatives to capitalism: toward a relational research agenda

Cruz¹,

Alves²,

Delbridge³

2017

M@n@gement

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last ten years, the latest acute economic crisis of global capitalism has put in check most of the institutional pillars of the post-Keynesian consensus: globalization, free trade, free movement of capital and labor, and so on. Status quo response to the crisis was the enforcement of austerity economic models, cutting public budgets and curbing public services. Those economic models remain the dominant ways of thinking in the post-2008 crisis (Davis, 2009). Austerity was not only prescribed to the indebted economies of the Global South, but also to the gigantic powers of the North: Western Europe and North America. It was not by chance that various movements of anti-capitalism and neoliberal policies erupted, such as "Occupy Wall Street" in the United States and the "15-M Outraged Movement" in Spain, bringing together a group of actors who demanded a radical transformation of order, the end of economic austerity programs, and the reduction of social inequalities. Attention and interest in the movements contesting the capitalist order grew not only among the general public, but also within the academic circuit, not least in the area of business management. After a sustained and deep criticism of the inability of conventional literature to transcend traditional models of capitalist organizations responsible for deepening inequalities and maintaining the economic crisis, it seems that there is a movement to search for alternative ways of organizing capitalism in a more humane way, with greater attention to social, economic and environmental sustainability of organizations. As a consequence, literature around the topic of organizing alternatives to capitalism has gained traction among scholars in business and organizational theory. One expression of that is the recent spread of different organizational models and legal structures over the world, portraying diverse labels, such as social entrepreneurship (Dacin, Dacin &

show abstract

Section: Current Debate On Organizing Alternatives To Capitalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Areas Of Research Incremental Alternatives Fundamental Altermentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Organizing Alternatives As Relations With Universitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Next steps in organizing alternatives to capitalism: toward a relational research agenda

Cruz¹,

Alves²,

Delbridge³

2017

M@n@gement

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…exposes the relations between truth and power’ in politically important ways (Schubert, 1995: 1005), or facilitates and supports the development of alternative organizations (e.g. Esper et al, 2017). Notably, craftiness inspires possibilities, as Marks (2008) notes, for social scientists to contribute to a parallel, expansive transformation of scientific practice that challenges Cartesian dualisms.…”

Section: Craft As Politics and Ethicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ethics, politics and embodied imagination in crafting scientific knowledge

Bell

Willmott

2019

Human Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article explores ‘research-as-craft’ as a sensitizing concept for disclosing the presence of ethics and politics, as well as embodiment and imagination, in the doing and representation of scientific activity. Routinely unnoticed, marginalized or suppressed in methodology sections of articles and methodology textbooks, research-as-craft gestures towards messy, tacit, uncertain, yet rarely thematized, practices that are central to getting science done. To acknowledge and address the significance of research-as-craft in knowledge production, we show how it relates to three forms of reflexivity – constitutive, epistemic and disruptive. Through this we demonstrate the craftiness that is required when struggling with the indeterminacy that is endemic to the production and communication of scientific knowledge. By showing how empirical situations require imaginative interpretation by embodied researchers, we argue that our conception of research-as-craft facilitates appreciation of scientific inquiry as an indexical activity that involves the crafted object and the researcher in an ethico-political process of co-constituting knowledge.

show abstract

Authenticating brand activism: Negotiating the boundaries of free speech to make a change

Sibai

Mimoun

Boukis

2021

Psychology and Marketing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Activist brands commonly engage in controversies to redefine which opinions and ideas are acceptable to express publicly. We conceptualize this practice as free speech boundary work. How can activist brands negotiate the boundaries of free speech to authenticate their activist positioning? By conducting a comparative case study of 18 activist brands, we identify three controversial strategies—creating monstrous hybrids, challenging the establishment, and demonstrating exemplarity—each of them challenging the boundaries of free speech through a distinct mechanism. The results show that whether these strategies authenticate brands’ activism depends on their ability to communicate brands’ moral competency, defined in terms of moral sensitivity, moral vision, and moral integration. This study contributes to the literature on brand activism by proposing an integrative framework that articulates the mechanisms underlying the reformative power of controversial brand activism. Second, we contribute to the literature on brand activism authentication by introducing a competency‐oriented view that reveals the heterogeneous and multidimensional nature of activism authenticity and expands our conception of the spectrum of moral territories with which activist brands can engage.

show abstract

Supporting alternative organizations? Exploring scholars’ involvement in the performativity of worker-recuperated enterprises

Cited by 36 publications

References 58 publications

Next steps in organizing alternatives to capitalism: toward a relational research agenda

Next steps in organizing alternatives to capitalism: toward a relational research agenda

Ethics, politics and embodied imagination in crafting scientific knowledge

Authenticating brand activism: Negotiating the boundaries of free speech to make a change

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About