2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11154010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Europe’s Energy Policy Towards a Decarbonised Energy System: A Comparative Assessment

Abstract: The European Union (EU) aims to prepare its strategy and infrastructure for further decarbonisation of its energy system in the longer term towards 2050. Recent political discussions and research interest focus on ways to accelerate the development and deployment of low-carbon technologies with respect to the targets set for 2030 and 2050. However, the diverse options available that are to be implemented, are policy sensitive and need careful comparative assessment. This paper presents a multi-criteria approac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MCA possesses the ability to deal with ranking of many alternatives based on conflicting criteria, and it has been one of the fast-growing areas of Operational Research in the past 20 years, with various applications [54]. According to Karleuša [55], "MCA provides a systematic methodology to integrate heterogeneous and uncertain information with cost-benefit information and stakeholders views in an understandable framework to rank project alternatives.…”
Section: Multi-criteria Analysis As a Tool For Successful Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCA possesses the ability to deal with ranking of many alternatives based on conflicting criteria, and it has been one of the fast-growing areas of Operational Research in the past 20 years, with various applications [54]. According to Karleuša [55], "MCA provides a systematic methodology to integrate heterogeneous and uncertain information with cost-benefit information and stakeholders views in an understandable framework to rank project alternatives.…”
Section: Multi-criteria Analysis As a Tool For Successful Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained from the computations based on the pairwise comparison matrix provided in Table 5, are presented in Table 6, which includes the final results of AHP. 7.5% C 10 23% C 11 3.5% C 12 1.3%…”
Section: Application Of the Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SWOT analysis cannot be considered as a sufficient stand-alone tool to solve this energy planning problem. The complex nature of this process requires the use of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, which seem to be extremely powerful tools and able to deal with the different aspects that these problems include [8,10,11]. MCDM methods have been applied to many energy-related problems, such as energy planning and selection, energy resource allocation, energy policy, management of building energy, transportation systems, and electric utility planning [6,[12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In detail, the authors evaluate 16 alternatives according to energy, economic and social criteria. Alternative transformation paths to reach a sustainable energy system in the EU have been evaluated through a multi-criteria model based on fuzzy-PROMETHEE approach (Papapostolou, Karakosta, Kourti, Doukas, & Psarras, 2019). Also, ELECTRE method focuses the analysis on the relations of the domain between the alternatives.…”
Section: Outranking Relation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%