1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02205447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting rural telecommunications: A compromise solutions approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each candidate hub is evaluated according to j -1,2, ..., m criteria/acceptability indicators. In the case of a rural telecommunications network, as recommended by the Federation of American Scientists, (see Lee et al 1996) the possible acceptability indicators to be applied to each candidate hub are: economic activity, population, construction and operation costs, education, transportation, etc.…”
Section: Definition Of Model Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Each candidate hub is evaluated according to j -1,2, ..., m criteria/acceptability indicators. In the case of a rural telecommunications network, as recommended by the Federation of American Scientists, (see Lee et al 1996) the possible acceptability indicators to be applied to each candidate hub are: economic activity, population, construction and operation costs, education, transportation, etc.…”
Section: Definition Of Model Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 An illustrative example A case study, reported by Lee et al (1996), will be used to demonstrate the operation as well as the suitability of the proposed index. The purpose of this example is to design a telecommunications network in the state of Nebraska, where 24 candidate hubs (cities) are considered.…”
Section: Hierarchical Sorting Of Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations