2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2015.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Scholars: An Analysis of Academic Library Websites' Documentation on Metrics and Impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Open Access publishing, including Dawson, 2014 andMcDonald, Gibson, Yates, &Stephenson, 2016), academic librarians continue to grapple with how best to support faculty with the interpretation, location, and appropriate use of types of metrics. Research has described approaches that academic librarians can and do use to address the bibliometric needs of faculty (Corrall, Kennan, & Afzal, 2013;Hendrix, 2010;Suiter & Moulaison, 2015). Although librarians may have an increasing need to be more active in this area of support, to be effective in their work they require a solid understanding of the faculty perspective of metrics, a perspective that may or may not match their own.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open Access publishing, including Dawson, 2014 andMcDonald, Gibson, Yates, &Stephenson, 2016), academic librarians continue to grapple with how best to support faculty with the interpretation, location, and appropriate use of types of metrics. Research has described approaches that academic librarians can and do use to address the bibliometric needs of faculty (Corrall, Kennan, & Afzal, 2013;Hendrix, 2010;Suiter & Moulaison, 2015). Although librarians may have an increasing need to be more active in this area of support, to be effective in their work they require a solid understanding of the faculty perspective of metrics, a perspective that may or may not match their own.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En la correlación con citas recibidas, tan solo destaca Mendeley (Martín-Martín et al, 2016), así como en la cobertura de la producción científica indizada (Sugimoto et al, 2017;Robinson-García et al, 2014, p. 363;Suiter y Moulaison, 2015), convirtiéndose junto a Twitter (Hassan;Gillani, 2016), en prometedoras fuentes de datos sociales para las altmétricas.…”
Section: Las Correlacionesunclassified
“…Por tanto, Twitter y Mendeley parecen ser los más efectivos canales para medir el impacto social, aunque concretamente Twitter tenga una correlación más baja con las citas que Mendeley (Suiter y Moulaison, 2015). A ambos medios les siguen Facebook y Google+ (Hassan y Gillani, 2016).…”
Section: Las Correlacionesunclassified
“…A survey among education faculty members [13] showed that they required more support for grant activity, data management, intellectual property management and bibliometric analysis. The interest in supporting scholars in research assessment processes was reflected in the fact that by 2015 nearly all library websites of the Association of American Universities (AAU) members had web pages or LibGuides providing information on indicators and metrics to assist scholars in making a case for themselves and for their work [14]. Similarly, Ryś and Chadaj [15] report that bibliometric processes have become a vital part of library work in Poland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%