1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb01912.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of Delayed‐type Hypersensitivity and Hemolysis Induced by Previously Photooxidized Psoralen: Effect of Fluence Rate and Psoralen Concentration

Abstract: The kinetics of the formation of biologically active psoralen photooxidation (POP) products were analyzed by the biological effects produced. Effects of the UV light fluence rate and psoralen concentration during the preirradiation were investigated to assess the yield of POP products, which were active in vivo (inducing suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity [DTH] reaction to sheep red blood cells) and in vitro (altering the human erythrocyte membrane permeability). It was shown that the reciprocity law… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the Bunsen-Roscoe law was not fulfilled. It agrees with the data of Schalla et al [37] for 8-MOP-sensitized erythema and correlates with the results obtained for PUVA-and POP-hemolysis [23,28].…”
Section: Effects Of Bivalent Cation Chelator Edta On Puva-and Pop-indsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…the Bunsen-Roscoe law was not fulfilled. It agrees with the data of Schalla et al [37] for 8-MOP-sensitized erythema and correlates with the results obtained for PUVA-and POP-hemolysis [23,28].…”
Section: Effects Of Bivalent Cation Chelator Edta On Puva-and Pop-indsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…I , while concentration dependence of production of POP-immunosuppressors agrees with curve I in Fig. I [23]. POP-immunosuppressors are more efficiently produced under small fluence rates, while POP-hemolysins under high fluence rate conditions ofirradiation [23].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations