1996
DOI: 10.1029/95jb03118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface deformation due to a strike‐slip fault in an elastic gravitational layer overlying a viscoelastic gravitational half‐space

Abstract: Abstract. We extend a technique previously used to model surface displacements resulting from thrust faulting in an elastic-gravitational layer over a viscoelastic-gravitational half-space to the case of strike-slip faulting. The method involves the calculation of the Green's functions for a strike-slip point source contained in an elastic-gravitational layer over a viscoelastic-gravitational half-space. The correspondence principle of linear viscoelasticity is applied to introduce time dependence. The resulti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for viscoelastic case, the gravitational effect must be included for deformations which involve long periods of time (tens to hundreds of relaxation time). This is because gravity affects both the magnitude and pattern at long periods of time for a thrust-type slip and a strike slip (e.g., RUNDLE, 1982;MA and KUSZNIR, 1994;YU et al, 1996). However, since deformations only for the shorter periods (several times of relaxation time) following the Nankaido earthquake are modeled here, gravitational effects on viscoelastic deformations would be negligible, as are justified by previous studies (e.g., RUNDLE, 1982;IWASAKI, 1985;FERNÁ NDEZ et al, 1996).…”
Section: Finite Element Model and Viscoelastic Structuresmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, for viscoelastic case, the gravitational effect must be included for deformations which involve long periods of time (tens to hundreds of relaxation time). This is because gravity affects both the magnitude and pattern at long periods of time for a thrust-type slip and a strike slip (e.g., RUNDLE, 1982;MA and KUSZNIR, 1994;YU et al, 1996). However, since deformations only for the shorter periods (several times of relaxation time) following the Nankaido earthquake are modeled here, gravitational effects on viscoelastic deformations would be negligible, as are justified by previous studies (e.g., RUNDLE, 1982;IWASAKI, 1985;FERNÁ NDEZ et al, 1996).…”
Section: Finite Element Model and Viscoelastic Structuresmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Two different characteristics of the northern and southern part of the fault zone around the rupture of the 1999 earthquakes may be related to the elastic and viscoelastic response of the layers in the crust as a function of their thickness. When the thickness of the viscoelastic layer is greater than the thickness of the overlying elastic layer, the relaxation time of the layer can be longer than the thick elastic layer/thin viscoelastic layer model Jackson, 1977a, 1977b;Savage and Prescott, 1978;Yang and Toksöz, 1981;Yu et al, 1996;Hearn et al, 2002;Hearn, 2003). This may account for the dominant postseismic motions, which are related to the long relaxation time in the northern part of the fault zone as the result of the thin elastic layer in the crust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Transient postseismic deformations can continue from immediately after the earthquake time to several tens of years as a function of time dependent stress relaxation (Thatcher, 1983;Shen et al, 1994;Yu et al, 1996;Kenner and Segall, 2000;Hudnut et al, 2002;Ergintav et al, 2002;Owen et al, 2002). While the early phase of the time dependent postseismic motions reflects mainly the material properties of the fault zone and continued slip at depth, longer term deformation has been explained by viscoelastic materials distributed in the crust and upper mantle (Pollitz, 1997;Hearn et al, 2002;Hearn, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The estimates are, however, quite variable, ranging from 3x1015 Pa s [Ivins, 1996] to 6x1016 Pa s [Yu et al, 1996] to 4x1019 Pa s [Turcotte et al, 1984]. Integrated lithospheric viscosity is difficult to measure, however, though it is generally thought to be much greater than sublithospheric viscosity, of which estimates are of the order of 4x102ø…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%