2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface evaluation of carbon fibre composites using wavelet texture analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the five plates assessed by the expert observers as having a particularly poor surface finish quality (plates 2, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 8.1, indicated by an asterisk in Table 1) are also the plates given the lowest instrumental quality ratings (highest rankings) by the WTA method, see Table 3 and Figure 3. It can also be seen that these five plates are clearly separately grouped in the right half of Figure 2, confirming the ability of the WTA method to act as an accurate categorical classifier of composite surface finish quality [17,18] . Here, a simple good/bad quality classification criterion could be based on first principal component scores for sample plates as either less than/ greater than, say, 2500.…”
Section: Automotive Industrysupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen that the five plates assessed by the expert observers as having a particularly poor surface finish quality (plates 2, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 8.1, indicated by an asterisk in Table 1) are also the plates given the lowest instrumental quality ratings (highest rankings) by the WTA method, see Table 3 and Figure 3. It can also be seen that these five plates are clearly separately grouped in the right half of Figure 2, confirming the ability of the WTA method to act as an accurate categorical classifier of composite surface finish quality [17,18] . Here, a simple good/bad quality classification criterion could be based on first principal component scores for sample plates as either less than/ greater than, say, 2500.…”
Section: Automotive Industrysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Previous work has established the general feasibility of wavelet texture analysis (WTA) for the task of automatically classifying the surface finish of both clear resin with plain weave and gel-coat carbon fibre-reinforced polymer panels into broad quality grades [17,18] and that WTA will produce repeatable results if reasonable precautions are taken in sample imaging [19] . This paper demonstrates the application of WTA to the new task of automatically ranking the…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the FPT effect, the quality control systems of original equipment manufacturer (OEMs) are either based on subjective perception of professional auditors 1 or on objective parameters resulting from optical 5,1719 and tactile measuring 7,8,20,21 methods. In 9,17 a white light interferometer (WLI) is used to determine the regions 17 and linear 9 surface roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beside the process inherent parameters, the resulting surface quality is affected by the tool surface 7,9 and additional surface modifications, such as application of gelcoat, 13,14 in-mold coating, 15 surface films, 16 and subsequent painting process. 3 To evaluate the FPT effect, the quality control systems of original equipment manufacturer (OEMs) are either based on subjective perception of professional auditors 1 or on objective parameters resulting from optical 5,[17][18][19] and tactile measuring 7,8,20,21 methods. In 9,17 a white light interferometer (WLI) is used to determine the regions 17 and linear 9 surface roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation