2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface functionalization of titanium implants with chitosan-catechol conjugate for suppression of ROS-induced cells damage and improvement of osteogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
104
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
104
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the coatings obtained by both LbL methods exhibit higher hydrophilicity than the glass control. These results can be related by the presence of the catechol groups in modified CHT and HA, since an hydrophilicity increase of the glass substrate after deposition of multilayer films containing catechol‐modified HA was previously reported (Chen et al, ; Hong et al, ; Neto et al, ; Zhang, Li, Yuan, Cui, & Yang, ). Particularly, in a previous work developed by our group (Neto et al, ), [CHT/HA‐C] 10 dip‐coated films showed lower WCA values (around 73°) compared to [CHT/HA] 10 dip‐coated films (around 77°), using glass as substrate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was found that the coatings obtained by both LbL methods exhibit higher hydrophilicity than the glass control. These results can be related by the presence of the catechol groups in modified CHT and HA, since an hydrophilicity increase of the glass substrate after deposition of multilayer films containing catechol‐modified HA was previously reported (Chen et al, ; Hong et al, ; Neto et al, ; Zhang, Li, Yuan, Cui, & Yang, ). Particularly, in a previous work developed by our group (Neto et al, ), [CHT/HA‐C] 10 dip‐coated films showed lower WCA values (around 73°) compared to [CHT/HA] 10 dip‐coated films (around 77°), using glass as substrate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Particularly, the increase of the implant surface roughness has been used to enhance the bonding strength of living tissues, due to the higher specific surface area of the implant in the tissue‐implant contact (Krishna Alla et al, ). Moreover, for Ti substrates, Chen et al already demonstrated that multilayered coatings with higher surface roughness promoted improved osteoblasts adhesion, proliferation and differentiation (Chen et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxidative stress induced by ROS overproduction hinders bone healing at the interface between the bone and implant because it adversely affects the cell growth on the implant surface but large numbers of ROS would inevitably be generated when the cells are in contact with a biomaterial surface such as titanium, or as a result of complex reactions during the surgical procedure 4043 . To decrease the intracellular ROS production, although the administration of pharmaceutical antioxidants can be considered, conventional methods of drug administration to reduce oxidative stress-related defences face many challenges, such as the targeting of the bone repair cells and the cytotoxicity of antioxidant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To develop such a functional implant, surface modification is an effective approach. Recently, much research efforts on Ti surface modification, such as topographical modification and immobilization of bioactive molecules, have been carried out to enhance the osseointegration and antibacterial properties of the Ti materials . In general, Ti based implant materials with nanorod topologic structure exhibit inherent surface advantages thanks to their high surface area, controllable dimensions, and universal drug delivery capacity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%