2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19204430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Heterogeneity-Involved Estimation of Sample Size for Accuracy Assessment of Land Cover Product from Satellite Imagery

Abstract: Sample size estimation is a key issue for validating land cover products derived from satellite images. Based on the fact that present sample size estimation methods account for the characteristics of the Earth’s subsurface, this study developed a model for estimating sample size by considering the scale effect and surface heterogeneity. First, we introduced a watershed with different areas to indicate the scale effect on the sample size. Then, by employing an all-subsets regression feature selection method, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to further understand the agricultural landscape pattern of Dadu River Basin in Danba area at the landscape level, four landscape indices, landscape shape index (LSI), landscape contagion index (CONTAG), Shannon's diversity index (SIDI), and landscape patch richness (PR), were selected to describe it. As shown in Figure 8, PR, SIDI [8] and LSI in 2016 were greater than those in 2013. CONTAG in 2016 was higher than that in 2013 on the third to fourth drought gradient, which was opposite on the fifth to sixth gradient.…”
Section: Analysis Of Agricultural Landscape Patterns Based On Drought Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In order to further understand the agricultural landscape pattern of Dadu River Basin in Danba area at the landscape level, four landscape indices, landscape shape index (LSI), landscape contagion index (CONTAG), Shannon's diversity index (SIDI), and landscape patch richness (PR), were selected to describe it. As shown in Figure 8, PR, SIDI [8] and LSI in 2016 were greater than those in 2013. CONTAG in 2016 was higher than that in 2013 on the third to fourth drought gradient, which was opposite on the fifth to sixth gradient.…”
Section: Analysis Of Agricultural Landscape Patterns Based On Drought Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 79%