2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface modified PLGA nanoparticles for brain targeting of Bacoside-A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that spherical particles moving through a vessel do not deviate from its streamline motion unless experiencing an external force; however, in the case of aspheric particles, segregation can occur. 29 Mean particle sizes for formulations NPG1, NPG2, and NPG3 were 176.6±11.6 nm, 176.5±2.9 nm, and 182.9±2.5 nm, respectively. Span values of Gat-loaded PLGA NPs ranged between 0.7 and 1.07, with PI ,0.38, thereby reflecting a slight polydispersion in particle sizes, which indicates that the method employed for the preparation of NPs results in monodisperse distributions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that spherical particles moving through a vessel do not deviate from its streamline motion unless experiencing an external force; however, in the case of aspheric particles, segregation can occur. 29 Mean particle sizes for formulations NPG1, NPG2, and NPG3 were 176.6±11.6 nm, 176.5±2.9 nm, and 182.9±2.5 nm, respectively. Span values of Gat-loaded PLGA NPs ranged between 0.7 and 1.07, with PI ,0.38, thereby reflecting a slight polydispersion in particle sizes, which indicates that the method employed for the preparation of NPs results in monodisperse distributions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall surface charge of cancer cells is normally negative [53] and positively charged nanoparticles strongly bind to the negatively charged cell membrane. Furthermore, positive nanoparticles have a much greater cytotoxicity compared to neutral nanoparticles due to being more efficient at penetrating and crossing the cell membrane of the cancer cell through endocytosis [55][56][57]. There was no correlation between zeta potential and the choice of PLGA, PVA loading, sonication time or PVA molecular weight (Table 2).…”
Section: Plga Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The minimum zeta potential required for stability is ±30 mV and all of the nanoparticles were positively charged with a zeta potential range of +35.2 to +57.5mV (Table 2). Furthermore, zeta potential is an important feature in relation to the interaction of nanoparticles with cell membranes which is influenced by the surface charge of the nanoparticles [55]. The overall surface charge of cancer cells is normally negative [53] and positively charged nanoparticles strongly bind to the negatively charged cell membrane.…”
Section: Plga Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images confirm the homogenous nature of particles with a uniform and aggregation-free distribution. 41 There are different emulsion stabilizers available such as PVA, carbopol and polaxamer. Among these, PVA is found to provide homogenous particles with uniform size distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%