Surgeons' opinions and concerns regarding prophylactic mesh placement when conducting a permanent colostomy A survey among 172 surgeons in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria

Abstract

Background Prophylactic mesh placement when creating a permanent colostomy was recommended by the 2017 European Hernia Society guidelines on the prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias (GPTPH2017). The extent of this recommendation is under debate based on the long-term data from clinical trials. Our aim was to conduct a survey of surgeons revealing perspectives and concerns regarding GPTPH2017 and to discuss their concerns. Methods From January 2023 to September 2023 a survey among surgeons of Germany, Switzerland and Austria was conducted. The questionnaire addressed biometric data of the participants, information on work experience/location, number of elective permanent colo- and ileostomies, and opinions on the recommendation of GPTPH2017 for prophylactic mesh placement. Results A total of 172 surgeons from Germany, Austria and Switzerland answered the questionnaire. The majority of the 59 participants stated professional experience of 20–30 years. Most of the surgeons (n = 51, 31.29%) worked in a hospital of primary care. A total of 112 (68.29%) participants were familiar with the GPTPH2017. Sixty-five surgeons (39.99%) stated that they never conduct a prophylactic mesh placement when creating an elective permanent colostomy (rarely, n = 44 (26.67%). Seven participants always place a mesh (4.24%). Main concerns regarding prophylactic mesh placement were the risk of wound infection (n = 107, 67.72%) and lack of evidence (n = 65, 41.14%). For some participants the GPTPH2017 is seen to be industry-driven with low evidence, too old and leading to overtreatment. Conclusions Main reason for not placing a prophylactic mesh when conducting a permanent colostomy was the risk of wound infection.