Surgery and opioids: evidence-based expert consensus guidelines on the perioperative use of opioids in the United Kingdom

Abstract

There are significant concerns regarding prescription and misuse of prescription opioids in the perioperative period. The Faculty of Pain Medicine at the Royal College of Anaesthetists have produced this evidence-based expert consensus guideline on surgery and opioids along with the Royal College of Surgery, Royal College of Psychiatry, Royal College of Nursing, and the British Pain Society. This expert consensus practice advisory reproduces the Faculty of Pain Medicine guidance. Perioperative stewardship of opioids starts with judicious opioid prescribing in primary and secondary care. Before surgery, it is important to assess risk factors for continued opioid use after surgery and identify those with chronic pain before surgery, some of whom may be taking opioids. A multidisciplinary perioperative care plan that includes a prehabilitation strategy and intraoperative and postoperative care needs to be formulated. This may need the input of a pain specialist. Emphasis is placed on optimum management of pain pre-, intra-, and postoperatively. The use of immediate-release opioids is preferred in the immediate postoperative period. Attention to ensuring a smooth care transition and communication from secondary to primary care for those taking opioids is highlighted. For opioid-naive patients (patients not taking opioids before surgery), no more than 7 days of opioid prescription is recommended. Persistent use of opioid needs a medical evaluation and exclusion of chronic post-surgical pain. The lack of grading of the evidence of each individual recommendation remains a major weakness of this guidance; however, evidence supporting each recommendation has been rigorously reviewed by experts in perioperative pain management.

Implementing an innovative, patient-centered approach to day case arthroplasty: improving patient outcomes through remote preoperative pharmacist consultations

“…Following discussion with the pharmacist, patients reported more confidence in taking pain killers. Levels of satisfaction with how pain is managed may be improved by providing patient-tailored analgesic regimens, in addition to ensuring patients are empowered to use optimal analgesia with an understanding of side effect and their management 24. The pharmacist intervention focused on safer use of opioids including advice on self-administration, weaning analgesia postoperatively and follow-up if required.…”

Opioids and Public Health: The Prescription Opioid Ecosystem and Need for Improved Management

“…The paradox is that opioid overdoses continue to escalate while opioid prescribing has decreased, despite the innumerable research publications documenting opioid prescribing and use, and the plethora of well-intentioned federal, state, local, and institutional legislation and policies, proliferation of guidelines, efforts by practitioners, and public awareness. More than half of dispensed Includes some information from Srivastava et al 173 SPECIAL ARTICLE opioids in the United States are unused, and most are not stored appropriately, creating a prescription opioid pool susceptible to diversion, misuse, and addiction. Attempts to solve the problem by restricting patient supply alone have not succeeded, and the prescription opioid pool remains large.…”

Process, structural and outcome quality indicators to support perioperative opioid stewardship for patients with bowel cancer; a rapid review

“…More process quality indicators than structure or outcome quality indicators are described in the literature. However, the factors which are reported to make the greatest difference to a patient's assessment of healthcare quality are process-related and process quality indicators are especially useful to consider when quality improvement is desired [77]. Fewer quality indicators concern the intraoperative and immediate recovery period.…”