Third Mobile Window Syndrome of the Inner Ear 2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-16586-3_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgery, Complication, Revisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we currently have guidelines for the diagnosis of SSCD ( 8 ), there are no published studies on the criteria for selecting a candidate for surgical intervention ( 36 ). Thus, in the case of very symptomatic and disabled patients in everyday life, the expected benefit/risk ratio must be discussed and very well-explained to avoid postoperative disappointments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we currently have guidelines for the diagnosis of SSCD ( 8 ), there are no published studies on the criteria for selecting a candidate for surgical intervention ( 36 ). Thus, in the case of very symptomatic and disabled patients in everyday life, the expected benefit/risk ratio must be discussed and very well-explained to avoid postoperative disappointments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgeons should be aware that a cause of surgical failure in a patient with SSCD may be the unnoticed presence of another OCD, even of minimal or “atypical” size. Considering the consistently poor postoperative results in this series of patients with multiple OCDs who underwent technically successful surgeries, it is justified to question whether the currently accepted third window techniques and mechanisms for (single) SSCD ( 36 , 37 ) also apply to multiple OCDs. It is reasonable to believe the opposite since in the case of several abnormal areas of low impedance at the level of the otic capsule, the dispersion of acoustic energy would be logically greater and more diffuse than in the case of a “single” TMW.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%