2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17399-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical excision vs Mohs' micrographic surgery for basal-cell carcinoma of the face: randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
250
3
32

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(291 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
250
3
32
Order By: Relevance
“…50 Smeets et al reported that for tumors requiring more than 1 standard excision, or at least 2 stages of MMS, defects after excision were significantly larger than after MMS for primary and recurrent BCC. 33 Although smaller defects did not lead to significant differences in aesthetic outcome between MMS and standard excision in RCTs, both surgical modalities were found to be superior to C&E with regard to quality of life outcomes. 31,33 A noteworthy limitation of MMS is that tissue blocks are not available for molecular testing or further evaluation of high-risk or unusual features by using paraffin sections.…”
Section: Standard Excisionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…50 Smeets et al reported that for tumors requiring more than 1 standard excision, or at least 2 stages of MMS, defects after excision were significantly larger than after MMS for primary and recurrent BCC. 33 Although smaller defects did not lead to significant differences in aesthetic outcome between MMS and standard excision in RCTs, both surgical modalities were found to be superior to C&E with regard to quality of life outcomes. 31,33 A noteworthy limitation of MMS is that tissue blocks are not available for molecular testing or further evaluation of high-risk or unusual features by using paraffin sections.…”
Section: Standard Excisionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…33 Although smaller defects did not lead to significant differences in aesthetic outcome between MMS and standard excision in RCTs, both surgical modalities were found to be superior to C&E with regard to quality of life outcomes. 31,33 A noteworthy limitation of MMS is that tissue blocks are not available for molecular testing or further evaluation of high-risk or unusual features by using paraffin sections. 55 To overcome this challenge, the tumor debulk specimen may be submitted for paraffin sections to document high-risk features and obtain ancillary molecular studies, if indicated, without compromising the integrity of the MMS procedure.…”
Section: Standard Excisionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sonuçlar Mohs mikrografik cerrahisinin nüks açısından en düşük oranları sağladığı bilgisini 10 yıllık takipte hem primer hem de rekkürren BHK için teyit etmiştir. Oysa aynı ekip erken dönemde ve 5 yıllık takipte Mohs mikrografik cerrahisini sadece rekürren tümörlerde avantajlı tespit etmiştir 12,13 . Bu çalışmanın sonuçları BHK ile ilişkili gerçeği yansıtan nüks bilgileri için takip süresinin 5 yıl değil 10 yıl olması gerekliliğini düşündürmektedir.…”
Section: Münih Metoduyla Mikrografik Cerrahiunclassified