IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2005.1596935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Gamma Probe with TlBr Semiconductor for Identification of Sentinel Lymph Node

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
6

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…There are criteria that guide the evaluation of radioguided probes in this type of application and define the minimum necessary requirements. 31 has shown that the physical characteristics have met the suggested proposals in international publications to be used as radioguided probes in the location of sentinel lymph nodes, marked with 99m Tc. Oliveira-Filho et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There are criteria that guide the evaluation of radioguided probes in this type of application and define the minimum necessary requirements. 31 has shown that the physical characteristics have met the suggested proposals in international publications to be used as radioguided probes in the location of sentinel lymph nodes, marked with 99m Tc. Oliveira-Filho et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Costa et al 31 reported that because of the high penetrability of gamma rays,radiation can be detected in any part of the patient and not only at the desired area. This situation implies that the detection should not only present high energy resolution, but also the capability to spatially reject undesirable gamma rays which might be reflected over the detector.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our previous works [2], [5], [11], the detectors were made with two electrodes and all of them showed the polarization effect with the aleatory pulse formation after a shorter period of bias application in the detectors, compared to that with 3 electrodes, as used in this work. Also, the progressive charge collection reduction, occurred with the two-electrode detector, was not observed with the three-electrode detector.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%