2016
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical interventions for vertical strabismus in superior oblique palsy

Abstract: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:To assess the relative effects of different surgical treatments for vertical strabismus in people with superior oblique palsy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When our cases were examined, diplopia was determined more frequently in adults in a similar way. 10,11 Superior oblique muscle palsy may be bilateral. The degree of excyclotorsion is typically higher in bilateral cases than in unilateral cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When our cases were examined, diplopia was determined more frequently in adults in a similar way. 10,11 Superior oblique muscle palsy may be bilateral. The degree of excyclotorsion is typically higher in bilateral cases than in unilateral cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Chang et al reviewed four different IO muscle-weakening surgeries for vertical strabismus in superior oblique palsy: myectomy, recession, anterior transposition, and disinsertion. [19] They could not find highquality evidence to support recommendations for surgical treatment choice in patients with vertical strabismus due to superior oblique palsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not pilot test the forms as specified in the protocol for this review as we included only two trials, which was the number of trials recommended for pilot testing the form (Chang 2016). Any discrepancies were resolved by discussion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PROTOCOL AND REVIEW After publication of the protocol (Chang 2016), we modified the outcomes to include the proportion of participants with relief of symptoms. As patients may seek treatment due to symptomatic diplopia and because some patients may still be symptomatic even when meeting objective criterion for surgical success, we added this outcome to assess the patient’s experience following surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%