Surgical Techniques for Lymphovenous Bypass: A Review

Abstract

Background: Lymphedema is a progressive, debilitating disease that may affect up to 250 million individuals worldwide. Complex decongestive therapy (CDT) remains the first line of treatment for lymphedema, and surgical treatment currently has no formally established role. In recent years, lymphovenous bypass (LVB) has emerged as a potentially efficacious intervention to improve patients' objective and subjective measures of lymphedema. Despite this promise, there are few evidence-based recommendations to inform the adoption of the practice. Methods: A narrative review of the present literature on LVB was performed through a query of records using various combinations of Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and keywords such as “lymphatic vessels,” “lymphedema,” “breast cancer lymphedema,” “surgical anastomosis,” “lymphovenous bypass,” “lymphovenous anastomosis.” The articles were assessed for 1) bibliometric characteristics, 2) preoperative evaluation, 2) operative techniques, 3) postoperative regimens, and 4) outcome measures. Results: The sixty-year evolution of LVB has transformed rapidly in response to technological advances in the last two decades. The geographically distributed investigation of these surgical innovations has prompted a fragmentation of LVB practice. As original research outpaces literature review, there needs to be more consistency in terminology, perioperative practices, and evaluation of outcomes of LVB, which challenge systematic analysis. The systematic reviews to date emphasize the ability of LVB to improve objective measures such as limb circumference. Still, the inconsistent use of subjective measures limits our appreciation of the collective improvement in patient-reported outcomes. Moreover, there are a limited number of accepted methods for patient selection, preoperative evaluation, and surgical planning, with many surgical techniques employed. Conclusion: The unifying principles and scientific evidence must be clarified to guide an overarching consensus before the widespread adoption of LVB. This article aims to synthesize recommendations and current institutional preferences concerning the research and clinical applications of LVB. The collaboration and continued refining of these practices will be necessary to establish the role of LVB in the treatment and prevention of lymphedema.