Survival pending revolution: Self-determination in the age of proto-neo-liberal globalization

Abstract

In 1971, the Black Panther Party (BPP) seemingly went through an ideological transformation. Between 1968 and 1970 the Party had forged strong national and international solidarity and support through a politics of revolutionary armed self-defence and a commitment to anti-imperialism. Yet, in late 1970 as the sands of both national and geo-politics shifted, and as allies, both at home and abroad, became less supportive, the Panthers found themselves on less solid ground. Black Panther leader Huey P Newton, realizing this shift in the political landscape, and the futility of attempting an armed insurgency against the state without widespread support, now steered the BPP towards the idea of ‘Survival Pending Revolution’. This saw the Panthers abandon the idea of immediate armed insurrection against the state and reorient towards a focus on their community engagement ‘survival programs’. This article argues that Newton’s orientation of the BPP away from armed insurrection and towards survival pending revolution was not simply a pragmatic choice of strategy, but rather based on a theorization of what he dubbed reactionary intercommunalism. Moreover, the article suggests that the history of neo-liberal globalization can be complicated and expanded by viewing Newton as one of the first theorists of neo-liberal globalization, and BPP survival programs as one of the first responses to the on-coming era of neo-liberalism in the US.

Resisting racial militarism: War, policing and the Black Panther Party

“…(Newton, 1972: 195) In an intercommunal world where US empire renders national liberation a chimera, the importance of 'liberated territory' becomes paramount, and a way to recognize the importance of land without capitulating to a nationalist framework. Newton therefore sought to pivot the revolutionary struggle away from a narrow focus on the nation-state and towards communities under siege from empire (Narayan, 2020). The USA's relationship to and support for Israel was therefore already indicative of the need for something different from, and more radical than, the creation of an independent nation-state in Palestine.…”

Transgressing to teach: Theorising race and security through struggle

“…A subversive mobilisation of-and-against security, it is a prefigurative principle which recognises the need to live in a world to which you cannot and will not accommodate yourself. As a way of thinking radical survival and action, it has outlasted the Panthers, and remains integral to contemporary movements against global racial capitalism (Narayan, 2020).…”