2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus–A. baumannii complex to imipenem, meropenem, sulbactam and colistin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant finding in their study was that eight (3.5%) isolates were resistant to both colistin and tigecycline. [32] Various authors have reported the resistance rate to colistin between 1.8% and 2%,[3334] while resistance to tigecycline varies from being nonexistent to 66%. [3536] We did not find any Acinetobacter isolate being resistant to colistin, which may be due to its selective use only in case of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant finding in their study was that eight (3.5%) isolates were resistant to both colistin and tigecycline. [32] Various authors have reported the resistance rate to colistin between 1.8% and 2%,[3334] while resistance to tigecycline varies from being nonexistent to 66%. [3536] We did not find any Acinetobacter isolate being resistant to colistin, which may be due to its selective use only in case of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the sulbactam CSF concentration-time curve in the group. The sulbactam concentration did not reach the level of MIC 50 of 8 mg/L for Acinetobacter baumannii [ 8 , 9 ].The relationship between cefoperazone concentrations at different time points and MIC 50 was presented in Figure 3 . There are 51.6% (32/62) of the cefoperazone concentrations at different time points over MIC 50 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%