Sustainable evaluation and verification in supply chains: Aligning and leveraging accountability to stakeholders

Abstract

Please cite this article as: Gualandris, Jury, Klassen, Robert D., Vachon, Stephan, Kalchschmidt, Matteo, Sustainable evaluation and verification in supply chains: Aligning and leveraging accountability to stakeholders.Journal of Operations Management http://dx. ABSTRACTManagers are being challenged by multiple (and diverse) stakeholders, which have variety of expectations and informational needs about their firm's supply chains. Collectively, these expectations and needs form a multi-faceted view of stakeholder accountability, namely the extent to which a firm justifies behaviors and actions across its extended supply chain to stakeholders. To date, sustainable supply chain management research has largely focused on monitoring as a self-managed set of narrowly defined evaluative activities employed by firms to provide stakeholder accountability. Nevertheless, evidence is emerging that firms have developed a wide variety of monitoring systems in order to align with stakeholders' expectations and leverage accountability to stakeholders. Drawing from the accounting literature, we synthesize a model that proposes how firms might address accountability for sustainability issues in their supply chain. At its core, the construct of sustainable evaluation and verification (SEV) captures three interrelated dimensions: inclusivity, scope, and disclosure. These dimensions characterize how supply chain processes might identify key measures, collect and process data, and finally, verify materiality, reliability and accuracy of any data and resulting information. As a result, the concept of monitoring is significantly extended, while also considering how different stakeholders can play diverse, active roles as metrics are established, audits are conducted, and information is validated. Also, several antecedents of SEV systems are explored. Finally, the means by which an SEV system can create a competitive advantage are investigated.

Role of Information and Communication Technology in Green Supply Chain Implementation and Companies’ Performance

“…This process represents a judges' validation and helped to adapt it to the context of the maquiladora industry [36,37].…”

Validation of Customer Perspectives in the Context of NGO’s Performance Evaluation in Kenya

“…This is supported by the study where presence of objectives related to customer service was extracted as one of items in factor loading 1 which a significant indicator for customer related performance measure. This outcome receives support from a perspective where organizations have been seen to set specific goals which are positively related to planning, quality and organizational performance [9]. A similar line of thinking was shared by Smith and Locke [10] who found that goals and task strategies were related to task performance and gave an assurance of future performance.…”

Can the SDGs Provide a Basis for Supply Chain Decisions in the Construction Sector?

“…Such variation in goal alignment would suggest that the position and role of an organisation within the supply network influences its view of how it can effect change and thus which SDGs are most relevant. This view is supported by Schmidt et al [67] who note that, whilst stakeholders advocate "monolithic" outcomes across the supply chain, very different issues are salient for different companies, which therefore set different goals depending on their position within the supply network [68]. This highlights the difficulty of aligning goals and targets between different parts of the value network, even where strong relationships already exist.…”