2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable mining development with community using design thinking and multi-criteria decision analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In proposing a multi-criteria decision analysis model, illustrated by a disguised Central American gold mining case study, Erzurumlu and Erzurumlu (2015) highlight the crucial nature in the design of community development programmes of community participation from the outset of an extractives project. They state that 'conventional approaches have failed to respond to the needs of the community without this involvement in decision making' (Erzurumlu and Erzurumlu 2015: 6).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In proposing a multi-criteria decision analysis model, illustrated by a disguised Central American gold mining case study, Erzurumlu and Erzurumlu (2015) highlight the crucial nature in the design of community development programmes of community participation from the outset of an extractives project. They state that 'conventional approaches have failed to respond to the needs of the community without this involvement in decision making' (Erzurumlu and Erzurumlu 2015: 6).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of learning and developing, different actors in the networks provide greater potential for learning and are necessary to evoke the potential solutions to solve complex issues [63,64]. These actors are internal and external to the firm and develop insights and observe what the local community does, how individual members think, and what they need and want; these actors understand and execute innovation activities within the network by developing knowledge and forming new innovation networks [61,63]. Although all the firms aim to reach this level, most encounter difficulties in the basic practice that requires collaboration in various business and management functions, such as marketing affiliations and certification schemes aligning to promote environmental awareness and education as well as new product development and innovation [65].…”
Section: Proposed Sbmcc Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have covered MCDA techniques for everything from maintaining or improving internal mining processes, such as described in Musingwini [24], to MCDA methods for balancing various factors similar to our approach, c.f., Stralka et al [25], Gelvez et al [26], Esteves [27], Betriea et al [28], and Erzurumlua et al [29]. As usual, there are various advantages and disadvantages with these methods, but generally, they primarily utilize techniques for asserting precise information, often making them quite inadequate for practical purposes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%